Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026

Process documentation tools turn how work gets done into guides, checklists and training material that other people can follow.

This ranking prefers independent single-product vendors, then weighs the effort of the first ninety days, the price once creators, exports and sign-on are added, how a library leaves the product, and whether each tool captures, runs or only stores procedures.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

In short

What process documentation tools software does

Process documentation software records or writes how tasks are done, then publishes the steps as guides, checklists or training modules that staff can follow, update and audit.

01

The top three

14 tools reviewed
02

How we ranked these

5 criteria, in order

Five tests decide the order: setup effort, real cost, how your data leaves, whether you can walk away, and who the process documentation tool was built for. On top of them sits one rule. The top three places are for challengers, which means vendors outside the big names, where the category has any, and the household brands come in from fourth place. Why those five, and why there is no score out of ten, is on the how we work page.

14tools reviewed
11publish a price
7have a free tier
1countries represented
03

Compared at a glance

14 tools
#ToolCountryPricingFree tier Right forNot for
#1FolgeNot stated by the vendorFree tier within stated limits; one-time licences with published prices and no subscriptionYesSolo operators and small teams who prefer paying once for their guide softwareTeams that need recurring checklists, task assignment or approval steps
#2SweetProcessNot stated by the vendorSingle plan with a published monthly rate for ten members plus a small add-on per extra person; 14-day trial—Small companies that want one predictable price and a shared procedure libraryBuyers who want a permanent entry level to run a long pilot
#3WhaleNot stated by the vendorFree plan for one creator, then Scale and Advance tiers billed yearly with priced extra creatorsYesTeams that want one place for SOPs, checklists and training from recorded videoBudget-minded teams that need redaction or approvals below Enterprise
#4DocsieNot stated by the vendorFree plan, then six published tiers charged monthly or yearly and metered by AI credits, seats and storageYesTeams that want to run their documentation on their own serversPeople who mainly want to record a screen and get steps
#5Glitter AINot stated by the vendorFree plan without a time limit; Growth and Scale published, Enterprise from a stated floor, with add-onsYesCompanies with big audiences and few authors, since viewers cost nothingSmall teams that need several authors on a modest budget
#6TangoNot stated by the vendorFree plan with a workflow cap; Pro per user with a lower rate from three users; Enterprise customYesTeams of three or more that want per-user pricing and branded exportsRegulated teams that need audit trails below the Enterprise tier
#7ScribeNot stated by the vendorFree Basic plan; Pro per seat with a cheaper rate from five seats; Enterprise through a sales demoYesTeams that want unlimited guide creation to start and a cheap team seat laterTeams whose screenshots hold personal data and who need redaction cheaply
#8IoradNot stated by the vendorPublished monthly plans by creator count; Enterprise quoted from twenty creators—Support and training teams with few authors and large learner audiencesSingle authors working on a tight budget alone
#9Process StreetNot stated by the vendorQuoted per plan through a contact sales button; Pro opens with a 14-day trial—Companies that want procedures executed as tracked workflow runs, not only written downTeams that want quick screen capture to turn clicks into steps
#10TrainualNot stated by the vendorQuoted per team across four plans with a booked demo; one-time implementation fee applies—Mid-sized companies onboarding staff into written roles and training materialVery small teams or organisations above 1,000 staff
#11GuiddeNot stated by the vendorFree plan, then Pro and Business monthly per creator; Enterprise custom, with an annual discountYesTeams that prefer short videos with a voiceover over written step listsTeams that need printable, text-first procedures for audits
#12StonlyNot stated by the vendorTwo plans without listed prices, Small Business and Enterprise; 14-day trial then a Basic level—Support teams guiding customers through interactive troubleshooting and help contentInternal teams wanting an unmetered library of company procedures
#13SliteNot stated by the vendorPublished per-user tiers billed yearly, credit add-ons sold separately; 14-day trial—Teams keeping written procedures and notes beside their everyday documentsTeams that want clicks turned into steps automatically
#14TettraNot stated by the vendorPublished per-user rate with a ten-user minimum; 30-day trial; Enterprise custom—Teams already keeping written procedures in a wiki and wanting answers from itTeams wanting a permanent entry plan or step capture

We list the country the vendor operates from or contracts through. That is not the same as the hosting region, and any difference is spelled out in the entry.

04

The 14 tools, reviewed

Ranked

1. Folge · 2. SweetProcess · 3. Whale · 4. Docsie · 5. Glitter AI · 6. Tango · 7. Scribe · 8. Iorad · 9. Process Street · 10. Trainual · 11. Guidde · 12. Stonly · 13. Slite · 14. Tettra

#1 Folge

Desktop app for step-by-step guides, bought once instead of rented

Ranked #1 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Folge builds guides on your own computer, with nested steps, a blur tool for hiding sensitive data and a cover page editor for PDF exports. The Personal licence is tied to one platform and one machine, so someone using both a Mac and a Windows laptop should look at the Business licence.

Purchases carry a 7-day money-back guarantee, and prices exclude VAT. The pages read describe no workflow tracking, so the output is a document to file.

What stands out
  • One-time licence
  • Desktop app
  • Blur tool
Where it costs you
  • The free tier stops at 5 guides and 20 online guides, so a growing library needs a paid licence quickly.
  • A Business licence is bought per seat, so a large team pays for every person up front.
Right for

Solo operators and small teams who prefer paying once for their guide software

Wrong for

Teams that need recurring checklists, task assignment or approval steps

Not stated by the vendorFree tier within stated limits; one-time licences with published prices and no subscription

#2 SweetProcess

Procedure documentation on one plan that includes every feature

Ranked #2 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Published pricingElsewhere

SweetProcess keeps the pricing simple by offering a single plan where every feature is included, billed monthly or yearly with a saving for the yearly option. Teams under ten employees are pointed to a separate discounted signup whose price is not shown.

The browser plugin turns recorded actions into a procedure, and AI can draft documents, while colleagues propose changes to what has been written. That makes it a documentation hub rather than a pure capture tool.

What stands out
  • Single plan
  • Browser recorder
  • Improvement suggestions
Where it costs you
  • Only a 14-day trial and a 30-day money-back guarantee are offered for testing, with no permanent entry level.
  • The pricing is stated for up to ten members, so a very small team pays for seats it may not fill.
Right for

Small companies that want one predictable price and a shared procedure library

Wrong for

Buyers who want a permanent entry level to run a long pilot

Not stated by the vendorSingle plan with a published monthly rate for ten members plus a small add-on per extra person; 14-day trial

#3 Whale

Turns videos into SOPs, then wraps them in training flows

Ranked #3 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Whale starts from a recording or a video and converts it into a written standard operating procedure, then lets you attach checklists and training flows with quizzes. The Free plan allows 20 playbook items, 1 training flow and a one-off 20 AI credits.

Scale adds PDF and Word export and MCP access, while Advance brings a video editor, AI voiceovers and enforced SSO. Extra creators are charged on both paid tiers, and nonprofits get a discount.

What stands out
  • Video to SOP
  • Training flows
  • US or EU hosting
Where it costs you
  • Scale and Advance cover 3 and 5 creators, so the first paid step costs far more than the Free plan suggests.
  • Whale lists approvals, redaction and API access under Enterprise alone.
Right for

Teams that want one place for SOPs, checklists and training from recorded video

Wrong for

Budget-minded teams that need redaction or approvals below Enterprise

Not stated by the vendorFree plan for one creator, then Scale and Advance tiers billed yearly with priced extra creators

#4 Docsie

Documentation platform metered by AI credits, with a self-hosted option

Ranked #4 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierSelf-hostablePublished pricingElsewhere

Docsie spreads its plans over Free, Hobby, Starter, Premium, Business, Organization and Enterprise, with annual contracts on the last. Business adds Confluence, GitHub and GitLab connectors, and Premium lists 50,000 API calls.

On the homepage it names Docsie Compare, for checking documents and sources against each other, and Video Analysis, for asking questions of a video. The self-hosted option is listed with the line 'Run Docsie on your own servers'.

What stands out
  • Self-hosted option
  • AI credits
  • MCP server
Where it costs you
  • Several separate meters make next year's bill harder to predict.
  • The Free plan gives a single seat and a one-off allowance of AI credits at signup.
Right for

Teams that want to run their documentation on their own servers

Wrong for

People who mainly want to record a screen and get steps

Not stated by the vendorFree plan, then six published tiers charged monthly or yearly and metered by AI credits, seats and storage

#5 Glitter AI

Screen recordings become numbered-step SOPs with optional AI voiceover

Ranked #5 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Glitter AI prices by creators included rather than by every reader, so a company with a large audience for its SOPs avoids paying for each person who only views them.

Scale adds SCORM and PowerPoint export and sync with Intercom, Zendesk and Notion, while Enterprise brings secure embeds and a HIPAA BAA. Output can carry an AI voiceover or an AI avatar, and an MCP server and API exist. Growth and Scale carry a 7-day money-back guarantee.

What stands out
  • Video to SOP
  • Free viewers
  • SCORM export
Where it costs you
  • SAML SSO is a $300 monthly add-on, so identity features raise the bill quickly.
  • Free use ends after three guides or a quarter-hour of recording.
Right for

Companies with big audiences and few authors, since viewers cost nothing

Wrong for

Small teams that need several authors on a modest budget

Not stated by the vendorFree plan without a time limit; Growth and Scale published, Enterprise from a stated floor, with add-ons

#6 Tango

Browser and desktop workflow capture priced per user

Ranked #6 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Tango's Free plan holds 5 shared workflows and up to 10 users per workspace, enough to test the capture flow. Pro removes the workflow cap, adds voice and video embeds and lets you brand workflows and exports.

Enterprise adds an MCP connector next to SSO and SCIM. Prices carry only a dollar sign and differ between annual and monthly billing. The terms name Tango Technology, Inc. as the contracting party, with a Delaware notice address.

What stands out
  • Per-user pricing
  • Desktop capture
  • MCP connector
Where it costs you
  • Version history is only 14 days on Pro, with the longer 365-day history reserved for Enterprise.
  • One or two users pay a higher per-user rate than teams of three or more.
Right for

Teams of three or more that want per-user pricing and branded exports

Wrong for

Regulated teams that need audit trails below the Enterprise tier

Not stated by the vendorFree plan with a workflow cap; Pro per user with a lower rate from three users; Enterprise custom

#7 Scribe

Click-by-click guides captured from web, desktop and mobile

Ranked #7 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Scribe lists yearly billing as a saving of 20 percent and shows Pro Personal from one seat and Pro Team from five. Pro adds web, mobile and desktop capture, branding, screenshot editing and exports in PDF, HTML and Markdown.

Enterprise brings SSO, roles, data governance, central management and translations. The terms give a San Francisco notice address for Colony Labs without naming a country of registration, and no trial of paid plans is mentioned.

What stands out
  • Free Basic plan
  • Per-seat Pro
  • PII redaction
Where it costs you
  • Basic has no desktop capture, branding or PDF and Word export, so most real use moves to Pro.
  • Scrubbing personal data automatically needs the Enterprise plan.
Right for

Teams that want unlimited guide creation to start and a cheap team seat later

Wrong for

Teams whose screenshots hold personal data and who need redaction cheaply

Not stated by the vendorFree Basic plan; Pro per seat with a cheaper rate from five seats; Enterprise through a sales demo

#8 Iorad

Tutorial capture across browsers and apps, priced per creator count

Ranked #8 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Published pricingElsewhere

Capture works through Chrome, Firefox and Edge extensions and Mac and Windows apps, so it is not tied to one browser. Integrations named include Zendesk, Slack, ServiceNow, Confluence, Salesforce and Seismic.

Team costs $500 a month for two or more creators, with one seat included and $50 a month for every extra seat, and Enterprise is quoted for twenty or more creators. Unlimited learners means the audience never adds to the bill.

What stands out
  • Per-creator plans
  • Data masking
  • Word and MP4 export
Where it costs you
  • A single creator pays $200 a month, far above seat-priced capture tools.
  • The pricing page gives no trial length or limits for its start buttons.
Right for

Support and training teams with few authors and large learner audiences

Wrong for

Single authors working on a tight budget alone

Not stated by the vendorPublished monthly plans by creator count; Enterprise quoted from twenty creators

#9 Process Street

Workflow and task platform in Startup, Pro and Enterprise tiers

Ranked #9 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Pricing on requestElsewhere

Startup includes unlimited workflows and tasks, 10 automation apps and 100 automation actions a month, with 5,000 data set records. Pro lists custom users and reports, data sync and BI integration, and offers invoicing alongside cards charged in USD.

Enterprise adds SCIM provisioning, a dedicated success manager and priority support. The terms name Process Street, Inc., with a San Francisco address, and say the service runs from offices in the United States.

What stands out
  • Workflow runs
  • Startup tier
  • Data residency
Where it costs you
  • Every plan shows a contact sales button instead of a price, so the real cost surfaces only in talks.
  • Startup caps users at 5 and public API calls at 50 a month.
Right for

Companies that want procedures executed as tracked workflow runs, not only written down

Wrong for

Teams that want quick screen capture to turn clicks into steps

Not stated by the vendorQuoted per plan through a contact sales button; Pro opens with a 14-day trial

#10 Trainual

Onboarding and training manuals sold through a booked demo

Ranked #10 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Pricing on requestElsewhere

Trainual splits its plans into Core, Pro, Premium and Enterprise, and the limits climb in steps: 2 GB, 15 GB, then unlimited video storage, with version history of 30 days, 90 days, then unlimited.

A custom domain arrives with Premium. No permanent plan or trial is named, and the demo replaces both. The terms name Trainual, Inc. in Tempe, Arizona, although the pages read give no registered office.

What stands out
  • Four plans
  • Implementation fee
  • Video storage caps
Where it costs you
  • Unpriced subscriptions come with an extra $1,000 set-up charge.
  • API access is limited to Enterprise and SSO to Premium or higher.
Right for

Mid-sized companies onboarding staff into written roles and training material

Wrong for

Very small teams or organisations above 1,000 staff

Not stated by the vendorQuoted per team across four plans with a booked demo; one-time implementation fee applies

#11 Guidde

Video how-to guides with AI voiceover, priced per creator

Ranked #11 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Free tierPublished pricingElsewhere

Guidde shows Pro and Business with struck-through earlier prices and an annual discount, with a Free plan that needs no credit card. An Advanced Editor sits next to Magic Capture for tuning the result.

Business adds insights and the conversion of PDFs and PowerPoints into video, while Enterprise adds Guidde Ask and sign-on through Okta, Microsoft and OneLogin. The footer shows guidde Inc. with no address, so the country is not stated.

What stands out
  • Magic Capture
  • AI voiceover
  • Per-creator billing
Where it costs you
  • The Business trial lasts only 7 days, which is short for testing a video workflow.
  • SSO, SCIM and multi-language translation are limited to Enterprise.
Right for

Teams that prefer short videos with a voiceover over written step lists

Wrong for

Teams that need printable, text-first procedures for audits

Not stated by the vendorFree plan, then Pro and Business monthly per creator; Enterprise custom, with an annual discount

#12 Stonly

Interactive guides and knowledge base capped by guide views

Ranked #12 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Pricing on requestElsewhere

Stonly's entry plan lists unlimited guides and tours, multiple languages, versioning, custom branding and full-path analytics, plus integrations with Segment, Zapier, Freshpaint and Rudderstack.

Enterprise removes the fixed caps and adds private knowledge bases. The pricing page shows no amounts or currency, and the homepage footer gives only a 2026 copyright notice, so the country of establishment is not stated.

What stands out
  • Guide-view caps
  • Knowledge base
  • Full-path analytics
Where it costs you
  • Views are capped, so a popular guide can exhaust the allowance on the entry plan.
  • Help desk integrations, AI agents and SSO appear only on Enterprise.
Right for

Support teams guiding customers through interactive troubleshooting and help content

Wrong for

Internal teams wanting an unmetered library of company procedures

Not stated by the vendorTwo plans without listed prices, Small Business and Enterprise; 14-day trial then a Basic level

#13 Slite

Team docs workspace with an AI agent and credit allowances

Ranked #13 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Published pricingElsewhere

Basic offers unlimited docs, 5 GB of storage per user and uploads up to 200 MB, along with 30 AI edits per user monthly.

Pro raises storage to 10 GB per user, lifts the upload limit, adds Slite Agent, search across connected tools, OpenID SSO and a custom domain for public docs. The trial includes 500 shared credits. Its controller details name Slite, Inc. in San Francisco.

What stands out
  • Per-user tiers
  • AI credits
  • Slite Agent
Where it costs you
  • AI edits and agent credits are capped per user each month, with paid blocks for extra use.
  • Nothing on the pages read describes screen capture, so steps and screenshots are added manually.
Right for

Teams keeping written procedures and notes beside their everyday documents

Wrong for

Teams that want clicks turned into steps automatically

Not stated by the vendorPublished per-user tiers billed yearly, credit add-ons sold separately; 14-day trial

#14 Tettra

Internal wiki with a question-answering bot, charged per user

Ranked #14 of 14 in Best Process Documentation Tools in 2026.

Published pricingElsewhere

Tettra lists Scaling at a per-user monthly rate with a 20 percent reduction on yearly billing, and Enterprise on custom pricing through sales. The homepage names questions and answers by Kai and knowledge management, in addition to the internal wiki.

The FAQ mentions Basic and Professional plans that do not appear in the comparison table, so check the current plan names with the vendor. The footer shows Tettra, Inc. without a location.

What stands out
  • Per-user rate
  • Kai bot
  • Ten-user minimum
Where it costs you
  • The ten-user minimum sets a floor under the monthly bill for the smallest teams.
  • The trial headline says no credit card, but the FAQ says one is needed after the trial.
Right for

Teams already keeping written procedures in a wiki and wanting answers from it

Wrong for

Teams wanting a permanent entry plan or step capture

Not stated by the vendorPublished per-user rate with a ten-user minimum; 30-day trial; Enterprise custom
06

How to choose process documentation tools software

Process documentation software records or writes how tasks are done, then publishes the steps as guides, checklists or training modules that staff can follow, update and audit. Differences that change the outcome seldom sit in the features. Here is the sequence we would follow.

  1. 01

    Check who publishes a price

    3 vendors on this page sell by quote, while 11 publish a pricing model you can read today: Folge, SweetProcess, Whale, Docsie, Glitter AI, Tango, Scribe, Iorad, Guidde, Slite, Tettra.

  2. 02

    Decide how much the jurisdiction matters

    Headquarters range over 1 countries and 1 regions: Elsewhere 14. Legal exposure follows the vendor, not only the data centre, so read the contracting entity before you sign.

Process documentation tools: capture, run or only store

Before comparing prices, decide which job you are buying for, because this market mixes three. Scribe, Tango, Guidde, Glitter AI and Iorad capture clicks or video and write the steps for you. Process Street and Trainual run or teach a procedure, with workflow tasks in one and training roles in the other. Slite and Tettra store written pages and answer questions.

SweetProcess sits between them, with a browser plugin that records a workflow and a library where teammates suggest edits. Whale and Glitter AI start from video and produce an SOP. A team that buys a wiki hoping for capture ends up typing every step and pasting every screenshot by hand, which defeats the reason most people shop for this software in the first place.

  • Write down whether you need capture, execution or storage
  • Test one real procedure end to end during the trial
  • Check that the tool you pick can edit a step later

Seats, creators and viewers on the bill

Vendors count different people, and that decides who pays more as the library grows. Scribe and Tango charge per seat or user, with a lower rate for larger groups. Guidde and Iorad charge per creator, and Glitter AI includes a set number of creators while viewers cost nothing. Whale charges for extra creators beyond those in each tier.

SweetProcess bills a flat rate for ten members and a small amount per extra person, and Folge sells licences once. Stonly meters guide views instead of people. Count authors, editors and readers separately, then ask each vendor to price exactly that mix, because a company with many readers and few authors gains from creator-based pricing.

  • Count authors, editors and readers as three groups
  • Ask what happens when viewers exceed an allowance
  • Compare one-time licences with subscriptions over three years

Exports, redaction and branding behind higher tiers

The features a documentation team needs for audits are the ones most often held back. Scribe's Basic plan lacks PDF and Word export, branding and desktop capture, and automatic redaction of PII and PHI sits on Enterprise. Whale also places automatic redaction on Enterprise, while Folge includes a blur tool and Iorad lists data masking.

Tango reserves 365-day version history and audit logs for Enterprise, and Glitter AI sells SAML SSO as a monthly add-on. Trainual limits API access to Enterprise. If screenshots show customer or patient data, check the redaction tier before anything else. Branding matters too, since Tango and Scribe both place it behind a paid plan. Finally, confirm that a guide can still be exported once the subscription ends.

  • Find the tier that includes redaction before you record
  • Export a finished guide to PDF or Word during the trial
  • Check version history length against your audit needs

Trials, setup fees and where the data lives

Entry terms vary more than the headline prices suggest. Process Street, SweetProcess and Stonly offer a 14-day trial, Guidde gives 7 days on its Business tier, and Tettra gives 30 days. Trainual replaces a trial with a demo and adds a one-time implementation fee. Docsie lists a self-hosted option through Helm charts and Docker images, and Whale lets customers pick US or EU hosting.

Process Street keeps data residency and private cloud for Enterprise. Glitter AI and Folge offer a short money-back guarantee instead of a trial. A trial only helps if you document a real procedure in it, so schedule the test around a task you genuinely need written.

  • Ask about setup fees before you book a demo
  • Confirm where data is hosted and whether you can choose
  • Use the trial on a live procedure, not a sample

What goes wrong most often when buying process documentation tools software

  • Buying a wiki such as Slite or Tettra when the real need is turning screen activity into steps, which those pages do not describe.
  • Comparing a per-seat price with a per-creator price without counting how many people only read the guides.
  • Recording screenshots that show personal data before checking which tier offers redaction, masking or blur.
  • Choosing a free plan for a pilot without checking its guide caps, such as the 5 guides in Folge or the 3 in Glitter AI.
07

Frequently asked questions

7 answers
What is the best process documentation tools in 2026?

Our ranking of 14 puts Folge first. Folge is a desktop app for macOS and Windows that sells guide-making as a purchase, not a subscription: a Personal licence covers one platform and one machine, while a per-seat Business licence adds offline collaboration.

Over several years that is the lowest running cost here. The trade-off is scope: it makes guides and tutorials, and the pages read name no checklists or approvals.

Which process documentation tools publish their pricing?

11 out of 14 state a price model on their own site:

  • Folge: Free tier within stated limits; one-time licences with published prices and no subscription.
  • SweetProcess: Single plan with a published monthly rate for ten members plus a small add-on per extra person; 14-day trial.
  • Whale: Free plan for one creator, then Scale and Advance tiers billed yearly with priced extra creators.
  • Docsie: Free plan, then six published tiers charged monthly or yearly and metered by AI credits, seats and storage.
  • Glitter AI: Free plan without a time limit; Growth and Scale published, Enterprise from a stated floor, with add-ons.
  • Tango: Free plan with a workflow cap; Pro per user with a lower rate from three users; Enterprise custom.
  • Scribe: Free Basic plan; Pro per seat with a cheaper rate from five seats; Enterprise through a sales demo.
  • Iorad: Published monthly plans by creator count; Enterprise quoted from twenty creators.
  • Guidde: Free plan, then Pro and Business monthly per creator; Enterprise custom, with an annual discount.
  • Slite: Published per-user tiers billed yearly, credit add-ons sold separately; 14-day trial.
  • Tettra: Published per-user rate with a ten-user minimum; 30-day trial; Enterprise custom.

The remaining 3 sell by quote.

Is there a free process documentation tool?

Folge, Whale, Docsie, Glitter AI, Tango, Scribe, Guidde come with a no-cost entry point, a free plan or a self-hosted edition.

Where are these process documentation tool vendors established?

In 1 countries across 1 regions: Elsewhere 14.

  • Folge: Not stated by the vendor.
  • SweetProcess: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Whale: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Docsie: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Glitter AI: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Tango: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Scribe: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Iorad: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Process Street: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Trainual: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Guidde: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Stonly: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Slite: Not stated by the vendor.
  • Tettra: Not stated by the vendor.
Which process documentation tools can you host yourself?

Docsie. The remaining 13 run only on the vendor's servers.

What should you use instead of Folge?

Look at SweetProcess (made for small companies that want one predictable price and a shared procedure library) and Whale (made for teams that want one place for SOPs, checklists and training from recorded video), which hold places two and three.

Who should not buy Folge?

Teams that need recurring checklists, task assignment or approval steps. The free tier stops at 5 guides and 20 online guides, so a growing library needs a paid licence quickly..

—

Tools reviewed

14 products
—

Alternatives pages in the same area

All alternatives
—

More Operations software advice

16 guides

For software vendors

Not on this list?

Sell process documentation tools and missing from the ranking? Send us a line on what the product does and who buys it. Whether it is added is our decision, though commercial arrangements can also affect it, and the terms of a listing sit on the software advice page.

Suggest a product →