Lindy alternatives: 11 AI agent platforms compared
Lindy is an AI assistant that lives in Slack, email and meetings and does work on request. Teams look elsewhere when credit metering makes the monthly bill hard to forecast, when they need a builder rather than a ready-made teammate, or when they want deployment on their own infrastructure, a European vendor or open source code.
Short answer: Challengers take places 1 to 3 here. Big brands follow in the order of our category ranking. For Lindy users, the top three picks from our AI agent platform ranking are Activepieces, Dust and Langdock. Pick Activepieces if you want automations whose source code you can read and self-host. These 11 products are all in Best AI Agent Platforms in 2026; the notes say how each one compares with Lindy.
Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.
Pricing: Free plan with credits; Team plan with pooled credits, published; Enterprise quoted
Established in: United States
Built for: Small teams automating inbox, meeting and Slack tasks without code
Not for: Regulated teams on a self-serve plan needing HIPAA coverage
01
Why buyers look past Lindy
01
Credits make cost depend on the task
Lindy's pricing page measures work in credits: everyday asks cost 2 to 250, deep work 250 to 1,000 and large builds 1,000 to 2,500. Team starts at 49.99 US dollars a month for 5,000 credits, billed for every active user. A busy month can drain the pool, and Lindy then pauses credit-using actions until the cycle resets or an admin tops up at 10 dollars per 1,000 credits.
02
Every person who talks to it takes a seat
Lindy bills anyone who uses it, including colleagues who only @mention it in Slack. New Slack joiners get a 7-day trial before the seat is billed, while direct signups are billed straight away. Monthly credits do not roll over, so seats used lightly still cost the full price, and a free plan lasts only seven days.
03
Governance sits on the quoted tier
HIPAA compliance with a signed BAA, SSO, SCIM and audit logs are listed under Enterprise, which is priced on request. The vendor is a US company, Crivello Corp, trading as Lindy. Teams that need those controls, or hosting in a region of their choice, have to open a sales conversation first.
you run a large company and want enterprise search to come first
#12
03
What each one does differently
1
Activepieces
Not stated by the vendor · Published
Activepieces gathers chat, agents, flows, tables and an MCP server in one workspace, and its Community Edition is open source under the MIT licence, so you can inspect and run the code yourself. The vendor's cloud runs in Frankfurt. Cloud usage is metered in credits, and each AI step consumes more than a plain step.
Switch from Lindy if you want automations whose source code you can read and self-host.
Dust, from a Paris company, builds agents that search the data your team has connected, and colleagues can browse each other's agents. Business is self-serve for up to 100 people, each seat carries a monthly credit allowance that does not roll over, and the free starter allowance is a one-time grant. Connector counts are limited until Enterprise.
Switch from Lindy if your main use is answering questions across company documents and tools.
Langdock is a German chat and agent workspace sold per user, with a Standard seat and a higher-usage Max seat both on the price list. Its pricing page offers managed, own-cloud and on-premises deployment. Workflow runs are capped by tier, and the agent governance add-on stops being free after 1 January 2027.
Switch from Lindy if you want a per-seat price and the option to run it on your own servers.
Dify runs as a hosted service or on your own servers via Docker through its Community Edition. Cloud plans are limited by message credits, apps, members and knowledge storage, and the free Sandbox allows a single member. The code carries an Apache 2.0 licence with added conditions on multi-tenant use and on keeping the logo.
Switch from Lindy if you want to build agents visually and host the platform yourself.
MindStudio takes a flat plan fee and then bills model usage at the provider's own API rates, and you can set spend limits for each agent. The starter plan allows one agent and 1,000 runs a month. A team tier is not published: SSO, SLAs and self-hosting options belong to a quoted Business plan.
Switch from Lindy if you would rather see raw model costs than a bundle of credits.
StackAI sells a starter plan with one seat, two projects and 500 runs a month on the vendor's cloud, then jumps to a quoted Enterprise tier. VPC and on-premises deployment exist only there, and its terms say customer data is not used to train models. Growing past one user means talking to sales.
Switch from Lindy if you want a small free trial of a builder before committing to a quote.
Relevance AI publishes a single Enterprise plan with unlimited agents, users and projects but no prices. Agents can be tested against quality benchmarks before release and held at approval gates for risky actions, and SSO, audit logs and data residency options are offered. Its terms allow data to sit outside Australia unless agreed otherwise.
Switch from Lindy if you need tested agents with human approval steps and will negotiate a contract.
CrewAI's free Basic plan includes a visual editor, an AI copilot, GitHub integration and 50 workflow executions a month. Enterprise adds SSO, role-based access and PII redaction, and can run in CrewAI's cloud, a private VPC or your infrastructure. Nothing sits between the two tiers, and Enterprise begins with a 45-day onboarding.
Switch from Lindy if your developers want to build multi-agent systems and test them free first.
Voiceflow focuses on conversational agents for chat and voice, connected to models from several providers, with role-based permissions and analytics. Agencies get usage-based billing with multi-client workspaces, and businesses book a demo. The pricing page lists no tiers or allowances, so cost cannot be estimated up front.
Switch from Lindy if you are building customer-facing chat or voice agents rather than an internal assistant.
Copilot Studio links agents to Teams, SharePoint and OneDrive plus more than 1,500 connectors and MCP servers. It is bought as prepaid credit packs or pay-as-you-go, and both need an active Azure subscription, so it is never a stand-alone purchase. It fits organisations whose files already live in Microsoft 365.
Switch from Lindy if your company runs on Microsoft 365 and Azure already.
Glean starts from search across a company's connected applications and layers agents and workflow automation on top, respecting each person's access rights, with a choice of more than forty models. The company is based in Palo Alto. The pricing page shows no prices and points to a demo, which suits large organisations.
Switch from Lindy if you run a large company and want enterprise search to come first.
Activepieces: The Community Edition is MIT licensed, and the vendor's cloud runs in Frankfurt if you prefer hosted.
02
You want a European vendor with per-seat pricing
Langdock: It is a Berlin company with Standard and Max seats published, plus managed, own-cloud and on-premises deployment.
03
You want questions answered from your company documents
Dust: Agents search connected company data, and Business is self-serve for up to 100 people.
04
You want model costs without a credit bundle
MindStudio: Usage is billed at the provider's API rates with a spend limit per agent, plus a flat plan fee.
05
Your company already runs on Microsoft 365
Microsoft Copilot Studio: Agents reach Teams, SharePoint and OneDrive, but purchase needs an active Azure subscription.
04
When Lindy is still the right choice
Lindy remains a good choice when the goal is a ready-made assistant rather than a platform to build on. It works inside Slack and email, drafts replies, records and follows up on meetings, and offers more than 1,500 integrations plus MCP. Approvals are built in, and its security page lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and GDPR. If your use is light and your credits last the month, a move may not pay off.
05
What moving off Lindy involves
01
Skills and routines have to be rebuilt
Lindy keeps its skills, scheduled routines and memory inside its own workspace, and we found no export format on the pages we read. List each routine you rely on, with its trigger and the tools it touches, and rebuild them one at a time in the new platform. Run both side by side for a billing cycle.
02
Connections and permissions start over
Lindy acts through each person's own accounts, so every mailbox, calendar and CRM link has to be authorised again. Check which actions need approval before they run, because other platforms set that per agent or per workflow instead. Tell colleagues who use it in Slack where the new assistant answers.
03
Usage meters do not translate
Credits in Lindy, runs in StackAI, message credits in Dify and token billing in MindStudio all count different things. Take a month of your Lindy usage, find the share of everyday asks against large builds, and price it in the new unit before committing to a plan.
06
Questions about replacing Lindy
6 answers
How much does Lindy cost?
Lindy's pricing page lists a free plan with 50 US dollars of credits that last seven days, a Team plan from 49.99 dollars a month for 5,000 credits, and Enterprise on request.
Higher credit bundles run up to 9,999.50 dollars a month, and top-ups cost 10 dollars per 1,000 credits.
Do unused Lindy credits carry over?
Monthly credits refresh at the start of each billing cycle and do not roll over, while top-up credits stay until they are used. If the pool runs out, Lindy pauses credit-using actions rather than billing extra, and admins can set credit allocations per seat.
Which Lindy alternatives can I run on my own servers?
Activepieces and Dify publish Community Editions you can self-host, and Langdock lists on-premises deployment. StackAI, CrewAI and MindStudio offer VPC or self-hosted options only on their quoted tiers. Lindy itself lists no self-hosted option on the pages we read.
Is there a European alternative to Lindy?
Dust is run from Paris and Langdock from Berlin. Activepieces runs its cloud in Frankfurt, though we could not confirm its legal entity.
Dust's own privacy policy says data is stored mainly in the United States, so check hosting terms as well as the vendor's country.
Which alternatives suit a developer team?
CrewAI, Dify and Activepieces are builders for people who want to design agents themselves. CrewAI's free plan includes 50 workflow executions a month, and Dify's Sandbox allows one member. Lindy is aimed at people who want a finished assistant, so a builder means more setup.
Does Lindy meet compliance requirements?
Its security page lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR and PIPEDA, and says data is not used to train models. The pricing page places a signed BAA, SSO, SCIM and audit logs on Enterprise, so ask which controls your plan includes.
—
Sources
Checked 10 November 2026
Lindy pricing: Free 50 dollars in credits for 7 days, Team from 49.99 dollars for 5,000 credits, top-ups 10 dollars per 1,000, no rollover, seat billing, Enterprise BAA, SSO, SCIM, audit logs, credit ranges.
Lindy security: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, no training on customer data, approvals built in.
Lindy enterprise: Slack-based teammate, SSO and SCIM, approvals, shared and personal use.
Lindy terms: Crivello Corp trading as Lindy, Oregon registration.
Activepieces pricing: Credit metering, AI step costs, self-hosted option, Community Edition.
Activepieces repository: MIT licence for Community Edition, commercial licence for enterprise features.
Dust pricing: Business up to 100 people, monthly credits without rollover, lifetime free allowance, Enterprise features.
Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page on this site; research and drafting are AI-assisted.
Checked and edited by Sebastiaan Smits, last on 10 November 2026. The editorial process explains the method.
