Translation software covers three different purchases sold under one name: a workbench for translators, a management system that routes content between people and machines, and a machine engine that does the first draft.
This guide ranks them on the hours the first ninety days take, the bill once words and languages grow, and whether your translation memory leaves with you.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry
says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a
vendor. How that works.
In short
What translation software does
Translation software stores approved translations, applies machine translation and terminology, and routes text between writers, translators and reviewers, so the same sentence is never paid for twice.
Five things, in this order. Feature counts are not among them: they are the least useful
comparison in software, because every vendor ticks every box.
01
Setup effort in translation software
What the first ninety days of a translation software rollout cost in hours, not in licence fees. A product that needs a partner engagement before it does anything is a different purchase from one a team configures in an afternoon.
02
What translation software really costs
What the bill becomes once the modules a normal buyer of translation software needs are added, and whether you can read that number without a sales conversation.
03
Getting your data out of translation software
How your own data comes back out, in what format, and whether that export is included in the translation software contract or billed as a project.
04
Independence from the vendor
Whether you can buy translation software, run it and leave it on your own terms. This test decides most of the order on this page, and it is why the largest vendors in translation software often sit below the smaller ones.
05
Who the product is built for
The size and shape of company each translation software product was actually built for. Most regret in software comes from buying for a company you are not yet.
The fourth test decides most of the order on this page, and it is the reason the largest
translation software vendors sit below the smaller ones. A product with a published price, an export
that works and no mandatory implementation partner is a product you can leave.
A platform suite that arrives with a quote, a partner and a two-year commitment may well be
the better software and is still the harder decision to reverse. We rank translation software for the
buyer who has to live with that decision without a procurement department, which is a stated
bias rather than a hidden one.
We do not publish a score out of ten. A number like 8.4 is a judgement dressed as a
measurement, and nobody can check it.
What you can check is on this page: what each translation tool costs, where the vendor is
established, whether the price is published, and what we think it is bad at. Our full method
is on the how we work page.
Per licence or subscription, published; enterprise quoted
—
An agency or team exchanging work with established freelance translators
A company wanting to stay independent of large language groups
Country is where the vendor is headquartered or contracts from, which is a
different question from where your data is hosted. Where the two tell different stories, the
entry says so.
Cloud localisation platform for software, help centres and marketing files
Ranked #1 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingEurope
Crowdin is the most complete self-serve option in this ranking: published plans, integrations for code repositories, help centres and design tools, and exports of memory as TMX and glossaries as TBX. Setup for a product team takes days, not months.
The bill is the part to model before signing, because hosted words count each source word once per target language. It is cloud only, and document-heavy work with tracked review is better served by memoQ.
What stands out
Published pricing
TMX export
Git integrations
Where it costs you
Hosted words multiply by target languages, so each new language raises the bill
Cloud only; no installation on your own servers
Right for
A software company translating product, help centre and marketing in-house
Wrong for
A legal or regulated team translating long documents
EstoniaFree tier; paid plans published, metered by hosted words and managers
Translation workbench and management server from an independent Budapest vendor
Ranked #2 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Self-hostablePublished pricingEurope
memoQ comes from a Budapest company that makes translation tools and nothing else, and it shows in the editor: quality checks, terminology and memory handling are built for people who translate all day.
TMS plans are not metered by word volume, and the server can run on-premise, which answers data-residency questions outright. The cost is a learning curve for occasional users, a Windows-only desktop client and fewer developer integrations than Crowdin.
What stands out
On-premise option
No word metering
Translator tooling
Where it costs you
The desktop client runs on Windows only
Weak fit for developers syncing strings from code repositories
Right for
An in-house translation team or agency translating documents at volume
Wrong for
A product team that wants localisation inside its release pipeline
HungaryPer licence, published for entry tiers; larger TMS plans quoted
Self-serve localisation platform for product, design and marketing teams
Ranked #3 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Lokalise was founded in Riga and contracts through a US corporation. It is built for teams that ship software often: designers see translations in Figma, mobile apps pull new strings over the air, and developers sync keys through a CLI or Git.
Setup is self-serve and quick. The weak points are the pricing ladder, where the advanced workflows sit on an expensive top tier, and limited tooling for document translation.
What stands out
Design integrations
Published tiers
Self-serve setup
Where it costs you
Large price step between the middle and top tiers
Key and seat limits force upgrades as products grow
Right for
A product and design team shipping mobile and web apps weekly
Wrong for
A team translating long documents through agencies
United StatesPer month by tier, published; enterprise quoted
Browser-based translation management with vendor and invoicing built in
Ranked #4 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Wordbee puts projects, supplier management, memory, terminology and supplier invoicing in one browser-based system. That combination is what a company buying from several agencies actually needs, and most rivals sell it as separate modules.
The trade is scale: a thinner integration list, few partners who know the product, and a dependence on the vendor's own team for setup, which takes weeks rather than days. Ask for export and continuity terms in writing.
What stands out
Vendor management
Supplier invoicing
Browser-based
Where it costs you
Fewer ready-made integrations than Phrase or Crowdin
Small company with few implementation partners
Right for
A company managing several translation agencies and wanting one control point
Wrong for
A developer team that only needs app strings translated
LuxembourgPer power user per month, partly published; enterprise tiers quoted
Memsource and Phrase Strings combined into one localisation platform
Ranked #5 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Phrase merged Memsource, a Prague TMS, with Phrase Strings, a German string-management tool, and sells them under one platform. Few vendors cover documents and code strings this well at once.
The pricing page shows the cost of that history: TMS seats, Strings seats, managed words, processed words and machine translation units are counted separately. Build a forecast from last year's volumes before choosing a tier, because the upgrade is where the budget goes.
What stands out
TMS and strings
Machine translation hub
Enterprise workflows
Where it costs you
Several separate usage meters make the real price hard to forecast
Two formerly separate products still show their seams
Right for
A company needing both document translation and software string management
Wrong for
A small team that wants one simple meter on its bill
CzechiaTeam plans published; seats, words and machine units metered separately
Machine translation from Cologne for staff, documents and developers
Ranked #6 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
DeepL is a machine engine with apps around it, not a management system. That is its value: staff get document and text translation on a business contract, glossaries keep product names consistent, and the API feeds Crowdin, memoQ and Phrase.
What it cannot do is route text to a reviewer, keep a project history or build your own memory. Budget per user for staff, and per character for the API.
What stands out
Machine translation
Glossaries
Document translation
Where it costs you
No workflow, review assignment or company-owned translation memory
The free tier lacks the data terms a business needs
Right for
A company replacing staff use of free web translators with licensed accounts
Wrong for
A team that needs review workflows and supplier management
GermanyPer user per month, published; API billed by characters
Plain string localisation tool priced by the number of strings
Ranked #7 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingNorth America
POEditor has been around since 2012 and stays close to its original job: import string files, let translators and machine translation fill them, and export them back. Pricing by string count is easy to forecast, and there is a free tier for small projects.
It lacks the review stages, supplier management and design integrations of Crowdin or Lokalise, and the vendor is small, so check how backups and exports work before committing.
What stands out
Published pricing
Free tier
String-based
Where it costs you
Little workflow beyond per-language assignment
Small vendor with a modest integration list
Right for
A small software team that wants strings translated with minimal setup
Wrong for
A company routing documents through several translation agencies
United StatesFree tier; paid plans per month by strings, published
App and website string localisation priced by source keys
Ranked #8 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Localazy prices by managed source keys with unlimited seats, which is unusual and makes volunteer or in-house reviewers free to add. Setup is a command-line tool and a config file, and a mobile app can be live in a new language the same week.
The limits are the scope, which is strings rather than documents, and the size of the company, where losing one engineer would slow the roadmap.
What stands out
Unlimited seats
Developer CLI
Shared translations
Where it costs you
No workflow for long documents or external agencies
Small team, so continuity depends on a few people
Right for
A small app team wanting translations without paying per reviewer
Wrong for
A company that routes work through translation agencies
CzechiaPer month by managed source keys, unlimited seats, published
Website translation layer for CMS and e-commerce sites
Ranked #9 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Weglot is a Paris company that sits between a website and its visitors and serves translated pages, with language URLs set up for search engines. A Shopify or WordPress site can be multilingual the same day.
The dependency is structural: translations are served from Weglot, so cancelling means rebuilding the multilingual site elsewhere from an export. Model the word count across all languages before choosing a plan.
What stands out
Website translation
Multilingual SEO
No-code setup
Where it costs you
Translated pages stop being served if the subscription ends
Word allowance counts every language, so growth moves you up a plan
Right for
A web shop or marketing site wanting languages live quickly
Wrong for
A company translating documents or software strings
FrancePer month by translated words and languages, published
Tolgee's in-context editing lets a translator alt-click a label in the running web app and correct it, which removes the usual screenshot hunt. The code is open source, so the product can be self-hosted and the exit stays clean.
The limits are age and scale: the vendor is young, the integrations favour JavaScript frameworks, and it has no supplier or document workflow, which rules it out as a company-wide system.
What stands out
Open source
In-context editing
Self-hosted
Where it costs you
Young company with a small team
Strongest in JavaScript web apps, thinner elsewhere
Right for
A web product team wanting translators to edit text in context
Wrong for
A company translating contracts, manuals or marketing brochures
CzechiaFree to self-host; cloud plans per month, published
AI translation platform with a marketplace of freelance linguists
Ranked #11 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Smartcat bundles machine translation, a browser editor and a marketplace for freelance linguists, with payments to them handled by the platform. That suits a company that has never bought translation and wants one account and one invoice.
Plans have been rebuilt around AI agents and annual commitments, so price the current tier rather than a review from last year, and vetting freelancers from a marketplace takes time that an established agency relationship already covers.
What stands out
Freelancer marketplace
AI translation
Annual billing
Where it costs you
Pricing and plan names have changed often
Freelancer quality varies and vetting falls to you
Right for
A company with no agency that wants to hire freelancers directly
Wrong for
A company that already has a trusted translation agency
United StatesAnnual plans by tier, published; larger tiers quoted
Weblate is GPL software from a small Czech company, and it is the only product here where the exit is trivially clean: translations stay in your Git repository, and the tool itself can run on your own servers without a licence fee.
Hosted plans exist for teams that do not want the operations work. The interface is functional rather than friendly, and anything outside software strings belongs in another tool.
What stands out
Open source
Self-hosted
Git-native
Where it costs you
Built for strings in version control, not for documents
Self-hosting puts upgrades, backups and security patches on your team
Right for
An engineering team that wants localisation it can host and inspect itself
Wrong for
A marketing or legal team translating documents and web pages
CzechiaFree to self-host under GPL; hosted plans per month, published
Localisation platform with unlimited seats and monthly AI credits
Ranked #13 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Lingohub prices by linguistic credits with unlimited seats, so the cost follows machine work rather than headcount. It covers app strings and marketing text, with style guides and glossaries feeding the AI drafts.
Watch credit consumption in the trial and ask which actions draw on the pool. The company is small and the connector list shorter than the larger string platforms such as Crowdin and Lokalise.
What stands out
Unlimited seats
Published pricing
Style guides
Where it costs you
Credit consumption is hard to predict before a trial
Shorter integration list than Crowdin or Lokalise
Right for
A mid-sized product team with many reviewers across markets
Wrong for
An agency needing supplier management and invoicing
AustriaPer month with unlimited seats and linguistic credits, published
Software and website localisation platform, now part of XTM
Ranked #14 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Transifex started as an open-source project in 2007 and still hosts many open-source translation communities. It covers software strings and websites, with continuous integration hooks and a live-site option.
Since the acquisition by XTM International it is one of three overlapping products in one group, so ask which product the vendor expects your use case to sit on in two years. Pricing by word range is published but rises steeply with volume.
What stands out
Word-based pricing
Open-source roots
Website localisation
Where it costs you
Roadmap now shared with XTM's other products
Word-range pricing climbs with content volume
Right for
A software company with continuous releases and a website to localise
Wrong for
A buyer wanting a single-product vendor for the long term
United StatesPer month by word range, published; enterprise quoted
Machine translation with an on-premise option, owned by ChapsVision
Ranked #15 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Self-hostablePublished pricingEurope
Systran has made machine translation since the 1960s and now belongs to the software group ChapsVision. Its distinguishing offer is a translation server installed in your own infrastructure, with trainable models, which suits defence, government and regulated industry.
The cloud per-user plans are published and ordinary. The on-premise route is quoted and brings hardware, upgrades and model maintenance with it, which a small IT team will feel.
What stands out
On-premise MT
Custom models
Per-user pricing
Where it costs you
Product range is wide and hard to compare
Now part of the ChapsVision group rather than independent
Right for
An organisation whose text may not leave its own network
Wrong for
A small team that just wants good cloud machine translation
FrancePer user per month, published; server installs quoted
Enterprise translation management from the group that also owns Transifex
Ranked #16 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
XTM Cloud is an enterprise TMS from XTM International, which has since bought Transifex and the agency management system XTRF. The workflow engine handles multi-step approvals and many suppliers, which is why it appears in large procurement shortlists.
The price is quoted, setup is a project with training, and the group now sells three overlapping products, so ask which one your use case will be steered towards in two years.
What stands out
Enterprise TMS
Workflow engine
Quoted pricing
Where it costs you
Quoted pricing and a long procurement cycle
Needs a trained administrator to configure workflows
Right for
A large localisation department with many suppliers and approval stages
Wrong for
A company with one person responsible for translation
United KingdomQuoted per organisation, by users, workflows and volume
AI translation platform sold together with its own human reviewers
Ranked #17 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
Lilt's model is a machine engine that learns from reviewer corrections, operated together with its own linguist network, sold as one enterprise contract. For a company with high volume and no agency, that is one supplier instead of three.
The cost is dependence: the memory, the trained models and the people all sit with Lilt. Pricing is quoted, and the exit terms for memory and model data need to be in the contract.
What stands out
AI plus human review
Enterprise contracts
Sales-led
Where it costs you
No meaningful self-serve trial
Software and service in one contract make switching harder
Right for
An enterprise wanting machine translation and human review from one vendor
Wrong for
A team that wants to bring its own translators
United StatesQuoted per organisation, annual contracts
Enterprise translation platform bundled with managed translation services
Ranked #18 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
Smartling is on the list because many large buyers will be shown it, and they should know how it compares. The platform is capable, with website proxy, connectors and quality scoring, and the vendor can supply the translators too.
That bundle is also the weakness on three of the five tests: setup runs through the vendor, the real price mixes licence and services, and leaving means replacing two suppliers at once.
What stands out
Enterprise TMS
Managed services
Quoted pricing
Where it costs you
Licence and service costs are bundled and hard to separate
Heavy setup that depends on the vendor's team
Right for
A large company wanting platform and translators from one supplier
Translator desktop standard and enterprise server from RWS
Ranked #19 of 19 in Best Translation Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Trados is on this list because most freelance translators already use it, and its package formats are what agencies expect to receive. That network effect is real.
Everything else points down the ranking: it belongs to RWS, one of the largest language services groups, licensing spans Studio, Trados Go and an enterprise server with separate terms, and the product is a gateway to RWS services and its Language Weaver engine.
What stands out
Industry file format
Desktop and browser
Large freelancer base
Where it costs you
Owned by RWS, which also sells services and machine translation to you
Licensing across desktop, browser and server is hard to compare
Right for
An agency or team exchanging work with established freelance translators
Wrong for
A company wanting to stay independent of large language groups
United KingdomPer licence or subscription, published; enterprise quoted
Translation software stores approved translations, applies machine translation and terminology, and routes text between writers, translators and reviewers, so the same sentence is never paid for twice. The differences that matter are rarely in the feature list, so this is
the order we would work through them.
01
Decide whether you need a published price
16 of the 19 tools here publish what they cost; the other 3 quote per organisation, which means a sales conversation before you can compare anything.
If you are buying without a procurement function, start with the ones that publish: Crowdin, memoQ, Lokalise, Wordbee, Phrase, DeepL, POEditor, Localazy, Weglot, Tolgee, Smartcat, Weblate, Lingohub, Transifex, Systran, Trados.
02
Work out what the first ninety days cost in time
Licence cost is the number in the contract; setup effort is the number that surprises people. Ask every shortlisted vendor who does the configuration, how long it took the last customer of your size, and what happens if that person leaves halfway.
03
Check the exit before the entry
Ask for an export of your own data in a format you can open, and ask whether it is included or billed as a project. A vendor that hesitates here is telling you what renewal negotiations will feel like in three years.
04
Match the tool to the size you are, not the size you plan to be
Most regret in this category comes from buying for a headcount that never arrived. The entry-level products here are not worse; they are aimed at a different company.
05
Decide how much the jurisdiction matters
These 19 vendors are established in 9 countries across 2 regions (Europe 13, North America 6). Where a vendor is established decides which government can compel access to what it holds, which is a different question from where the servers are. For most buyers that is a factor, not a veto.
06
Consider whether you want the source
2 of these are open source, which means you can host them yourself and read what they do with your data. That control is real, and so is the maintenance it hands you.
Three products are sold as translation software
Before comparing features, decide which of three purchases you are making. A translation workbench and management system, such as memoQ, Wordbee, Phrase or XTM Cloud, routes documents between translators and reviewers and keeps the memory. A string localisation platform, such as Crowdin, Lokalise, Localazy, Tolgee or Weblate, syncs text from code repositories and is judged by its developer tooling.
A machine engine, such as DeepL or Systran, drafts the text and has no workflow at all. Most complaints about translation software come from buying one of these to do another's job: a developer team stuck in a translator's editor, or a legal team trying to run review inside a machine translation app.
Write down whether your source text lives in documents, in code, or on a website.
Ask who does the translating: your staff, an agency, freelancers or a machine.
If the answer is all four, shortlist a management system first and plug the engine into it.
The meter decides the real price of translation software
Every vendor here measures something different, and the meter matters more than the list price. Crowdin counts hosted words multiplied by target languages, so going from three languages to eight multiplies the bill even with no new content. Weglot counts translated words across all languages, Transifex sells word ranges, POEditor counts strings, Localazy counts source keys and Lingohub counts AI credits.
Lokalise limits keys and seats per tier. Phrase counts seats per product, managed words, processed words and machine translation units separately. memoQ's TMS plans, by contrast, are not metered by volume. Take last year's word count and next year's language plan to every demo and ask the vendor to price that, not their example.
Model the bill at your planned number of languages, not today's.
Ask which actions consume credits or machine translation units.
Check whether reviewers and occasional contributors count as paid seats.
Translation memory is the asset, and the exit test
After two years, the translation memory and termbase are worth more than the licence: they are every sentence you have already paid for. The standard formats are TMX for memory and TBX for terminology, and Crowdin, memoQ, Phrase and Wordbee all export them.
Exports vary in completeness, though: metadata such as reviewer, date and project context is often lost, and some platforms export per project rather than as one memory. Weglot is the sharpest case, because it serves the translated website itself; cancel and the pages stop. Weblate and Tolgee are the cleanest exits, because the translations already sit in your own repository or server.
Export the full memory as TMX during the trial and open it in another tool.
Confirm the export is included in your plan, not a paid service request.
For website tools, ask what the site shows the day after cancellation.
Software only, or software with translators attached
The purchase that splits this market is not a feature but a supply question: who does the translating. memoQ, Crowdin, Lokalise and Wordbee sell software and expect you to bring your own translators, staff or agency. Smartcat adds a marketplace of freelancers, while Lilt and Smartling sell platform and linguists in one contract.
The bundle saves procurement work and a supplier relationship, and it is often cheaper per word. It also means the memory, the trained machine models and the people sit with one vendor, and the licence and service costs become hard to separate. Decide which you want before the demos, because each vendor will argue for the model it sells.
Ask for the software price with and without the vendor's translation services.
Check whether the memory built by the vendor's linguists is exportable and yours.
If you keep an agency, confirm it can work inside the platform without an extra licence.
What goes wrong most often when buying translation software
Letting staff paste contracts into a free web translator because no licensed tool exists. That is the most common data leak in this category.
Buying on the entry price without modelling the number of target languages. Most meters in this market multiply with every language added.
Starting without importing the existing translation memory. The agency you used for years holds it, and it is yours to ask for.
Choosing a developer-only string tool for a company whose real volume is documents, or the other way round.
07
Frequently asked questions
11 answers
What is the best translation in 2026?
Crowdin leads our ranking of 19. The best buy for a company that translates its own product and content without an agency in the middle. Plans are published, the integrations with code repositories and help centres are extensive, and memory exports as TMX.
The catch is the meter: hosted words are multiplied by target languages, so adding five languages multiplies the bill. Cloud only, and a mid-sized company with a smaller partner network than Phrase.
How did you rank these translation tools?
On what separates products after the demo: how much setup the first ninety days take, what the price becomes once the modules a normal buyer needs are added, how your data comes back out, whether you can buy and leave it without a partner engagement, and who the product is genuinely for.
That fourth test is why the large platform suites usually sit lower here than their market share would suggest. Not on feature counts, and not on a score we invented.
Which translation tools publish their pricing?
16 of the 19, with the pricing model each one publishes:
Crowdin: Free tier; paid plans published, metered by hosted words and managers.
memoQ: Per licence, published for entry tiers; larger TMS plans quoted.
Lokalise: Per month by tier, published; enterprise quoted.
Wordbee: Per power user per month, partly published; enterprise tiers quoted.
Phrase: Team plans published; seats, words and machine units metered separately.
DeepL: Per user per month, published; API billed by characters.
POEditor: Free tier; paid plans per month by strings, published.
Localazy: Per month by managed source keys, unlimited seats, published.
Weglot: Per month by translated words and languages, published.
Tolgee: Free to self-host; cloud plans per month, published.
Smartcat: Annual plans by tier, published; larger tiers quoted.
Weblate: Free to self-host under GPL; hosted plans per month, published.
Lingohub: Per month with unlimited seats and linguistic credits, published.
Transifex: Per month by word range, published; enterprise quoted.
Systran: Per user per month, published; server installs quoted.
Trados: Per licence or subscription, published; enterprise quoted.
The other 3 quote per organisation.
Is there a free translation tool?
Crowdin, POEditor, Tolgee, Weblate offer a free tier or a free self-hosted edition. Read what the free tier excludes before you plan around it.
Which translation tools are open source?
Tolgee, Weblate. Open source means you can read what the product does with your data and run it yourself. It does not mean the hosted edition is free.
Which translation tools can you host yourself?
memoQ, Tolgee, Weblate, Systran. The other 15 are sold as a hosted service only, which means the question of where your data sits is answered by the vendor, not by you.
Where are these translation vendors established?
In 9 countries across 2 regions: Europe 13, North America 6.
Crowdin is established in Estonia.
memoQ is established in Hungary.
Lokalise is established in the United States.
Wordbee is established in Luxembourg.
Phrase is established in Czechia.
DeepL is established in Germany.
POEditor is established in the United States.
Localazy is established in Czechia.
Weglot is established in France.
Tolgee is established in Czechia.
Smartcat is established in the United States.
Weblate is established in Czechia.
Lingohub is established in Austria.
Transifex is established in the United States.
Systran is established in France.
XTM Cloud is established in the United Kingdom.
Lilt is established in the United States.
Smartling is established in the United States.
Trados is established in the United Kingdom.
Establishment decides whose courts and whose disclosure laws apply, which is a separate question from where the data is hosted.
What should you use instead of Crowdin?
memoQ and Lokalise are the next two on this page. memoQ is for an in-house translation team or agency translating documents at volume; Lokalise is for a product and design team shipping mobile and web apps weekly.
All 19 are ranked here with what each one is bad at.
Who should not buy Crowdin?
A legal or regulated team translating long documents. Hosted words multiply by target languages, so each new language raises the bill.
Do you get paid for these rankings?
Vendors can pay for visibility, which affects where and how prominently a product appears. It does not change a word of what the entry says about that product, including the criticism, and it cannot buy inclusion for something that does not belong in the category.
We take no commission when you click through to a vendor and we do not know whether you bought anything. The full arrangement is on our disclosure page.
How often is this translation guide updated?
Whenever the facts move: a price change, an acquisition, a product that stops being maintained. The published and updated dates at the top of the page are real, and a review means someone went back to the vendor documentation rather than bumping a date.
These 19 products are the ones we judged worth ranking in translation. If yours belongs here and is missing, tell us what it does and who it is for, and we will look at it. Inclusion is an editorial call and it is not for sale — but nobody gets considered for a list they were never put in front of.
People land on this page with a shortlist to make, not a browsing habit to feed. That is a narrower audience than a banner reaches and a far more decided one.
Written by us, about you
We describe the product in our own words, say who it suits and say who it does not. A vendor never writes the entry and never sees it before it goes up.
A correction costs nothing
If a fact about your product is wrong here, tell us and we fix it, whether or not there is any money between us. That offer is older than any commercial arrangement on this site.
Placement is separate, and disclosed
Where a product sits in the ranking can be paid for, and the notice above the list says so on every page. What the entry says about the product is not for sale at any price.
We use analytics cookies only if you agree. See our privacy policy.
