Cloud storage is sold on price per terabyte and lived with on sync reliability.
This ranking weights whether the vendor can read your files, where the data physically sits, how the desktop client behaves with large folders, and what egress or migration costs when you leave.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry
says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a
vendor. How that works.
In short
What cloud storage software does
Cloud storage keeps files on a provider’s infrastructure, synchronises them to devices, and controls who inside and outside the organisation can open or edit them.
In this order: setup effort, what it really costs, how your data comes back out, whether
you can leave, and who each cloud storage tool is built for. One rule sits on top of those tests:
Places 1 to 3 go to challengers, vendors outside the best-known brands in a category, wherever the category has them; the established names follow from place 4 in their ranked order. Why those five, and why there is no
score out of ten, is on the how we work page.
Per user per month, published; minimum of three users on business plans
—
An organisation with retention, legal hold and audit requirements
A small team that just wants files in the cloud
Country is where the vendor is headquartered or contracts from, which is a
different question from where your data is hosted. Where the two tell different stories, the
entry says so.
Zero-knowledge storage from Germany at low monthly prices
Ranked #1 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingEurope
Filen encrypts client-side, hosts in Germany, publishes its client source and prices its plans below almost every subscription here, stacking them on one account when you need more. For a technically confident individual that is a good deal.
For an organisation the calculation is different: there is no meaningful admin console, no group policy, no audit trail, and the company behind it is small enough that the continuity question deserves an honest answer before you put the business on it.
What stands out
Zero knowledge
German hosting
Stackable plans
Where it costs you
Very small company behind it
Almost no team administration features
Right for
An individual or tiny team that wants encrypted EU storage cheaply
Wrong for
A company that needs user management, roles and audit
GermanyFree plan; monthly or annual plans by storage size, stackable, published
Small Slovenian service that also reaches your other cloud accounts
Ranked #2 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingEurope
Koofr is cheap EU storage with one unusual feature: it links your existing Dropbox, Google Drive and OneDrive accounts, so you can search across them and copy files out without downloading everything first. That is the tool for leaving those services.
Beyond that it is modest. Sharing and permissions are simple, the business side is an afterthought next to Tresorit or Egnyte, and it is a small Slovenian company whose long-term roadmap you have to take on trust.
What stands out
EU jurisdiction
Connects other clouds
Small vendor
Where it costs you
Team administration and audit logging are minimal
A small company, so continuity risk sits with a handful of people
Right for
Individuals and very small teams consolidating files from several US clouds
Wrong for
Regulated firms that need audit trails and admin controls
SloveniaFree 10 GB plan; paid yearly by storage size, published
Ranked #3 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierOpen sourcePublished pricingEurope
Internxt is a Spanish company building encrypted storage with open clients and a marketing position squarely aimed at people uncomfortable with American providers. The principles are sound and the lifetime pricing is genuinely cheap.
The engineering is not yet at the level of the products above it: upload and download speeds vary, the desktop clients have had rough releases, and the collaboration and sharing features are basic. It is a reasonable second home for files, not yet an obvious first one for a business.
What stands out
Open source
EU based
Lifetime plans
Where it costs you
Performance is inconsistent
Feature set is thin and still filling in
Right for
A privacy-motivated user moving off a US provider
Wrong for
A business that depends on reliable daily sync
SpainFree 1 GB plan; paid per year or one-off lifetime, published
Lifetime plans from a Swiss company, stored in the US or EU
Ranked #4 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
pCloud is one of the few providers selling storage as a one-off purchase rather than a subscription, and for someone who resents paying monthly for a terabyte that is the entire argument.
The company works under Swiss law, and data sits in Dallas or Luxembourg at your choice, picked at sign-up. Client-side encryption is a paid extra on personal plans, included in the Business plans, and the collaboration features are basic next to the office suites.
What stands out
Lifetime option
US or EU hosting
Client-side encryption paid on personal plans
Where it costs you
Client-side encryption is a paid extra on personal plans
Collaboration features are basic
Right for
Someone who wants to buy storage once and be done
Wrong for
A team that needs real-time document collaboration
SwitzerlandPer month, per year or one-off lifetime, published
Ranked #5 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingNorth America
Sync.com is end-to-end encrypted for every file by default, with no toggle to forget, which means the provider genuinely cannot read your data, a materially different position from the mainstream suites.
Canadian jurisdiction and HIPAA-ready terms follow from that. The trade is functional: no server-side search, few third-party integrations beyond Microsoft Office, and slower web access.
What stands out
Zero knowledge
Canadian jurisdiction
HIPAA and GDPR ready
Where it costs you
No server-side search
Few third-party integrations beyond Microsoft Office
Right for
A business that needs the provider to be unable to read the files
Wrong for
A team that needs search and integrations
CanadaFree 5 GB plan; Teams per user per month, minimum three users, published
Ranked #6 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Tresorit combines end-to-end encryption with the administrative controls an organisation actually needs — granular sharing policy, access expiry, audit logging — which is why law firms and clinics choose it over consumer-grade encrypted storage.
Swiss and EU hosting are standard. It is expensive per seat and noticeably slower on large transfers, which is the cost of encrypting everything on the client.
What stands out
End-to-end encrypted
Swiss and EU hosting
Granular sharing policy
Where it costs you
Expensive per seat
Noticeably slower on large transfers
Right for
A law firm or clinic with confidentiality obligations
The only fully self-hosted option here, so the files sit on infrastructure you control, with an app ecosystem covering calendars, chat and office documents. You are now running a storage service, and it will behave like one.
What stands out
Open source
Self-hosted
Full data control
Where it costs you
You are now running a storage service
Performance depends entirely on your hosting
Right for
An organisation that must keep files on its own infrastructure
Wrong for
A team with no operations capacity
GermanyFree self-hosted; enterprise subscriptions per user per year, published
End-to-end encrypted storage from a privacy company
Ranked #8 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierOpen sourcePublished pricingEurope
Proton Drive applies the model Proton built for mail: keys stay with the user, so the provider cannot hand over readable files because it does not have them. Swiss jurisdiction and open source clients make that claim checkable rather than promotional.
The cost is convenience, and it is real. Desktop sync is slower and less mature than Dropbox, co-editing happens in Proton's own Docs and Sheets editors rather than a full office suite, and server-side search cannot work the way it does when the provider can read your documents.
What stands out
End-to-end encrypted
Swiss jurisdiction
Open source clients
Where it costs you
Sync lags the mainstream services; co-editing only in Proton's own Docs and Sheets
Search is limited by the encryption model
Right for
A company that wants files the provider genuinely cannot read
Wrong for
A team that lives in shared documents and real-time editing
SwitzerlandFree tier; paid per user per month, published
Norwegian storage and device backup at a published price
Ranked #9 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingEurope
Jottacloud sells what most small companies actually need: files synchronised, devices backed up, and a price on the website that does not change after a sales call. Norwegian ownership and Norwegian data centres put it outside US reach, and Norway follows GDPR through the EEA.
The limits are equally plain. Files are encrypted in transit and at rest but not end to end, sharing and co-editing are basic, and the admin console is built for a handful of users.
What stands out
Norwegian jurisdiction
Published pricing
Device backup
Where it costs you
Not end-to-end encrypted, so the provider can access stored files
Collaboration features trail Google Drive and OneDrive by a distance
Right for
Small Nordic or European firms wanting Norwegian jurisdiction and a predictable bill
Wrong for
Firms that need zero-knowledge encryption or deep collaboration
NorwayFree tier; paid per month or year by plan and user count, published
Team folders and file sync at a low per-user price
Ranked #10 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingAsia-Pacific
WorkDrive is Zoho's team storage: folders owned by the team rather than a person, role-based permissions, version history, desktop sync and an office editor for documents and spreadsheets, all at a per-user price below the American suites.
Inside the Zoho estate that is a sensible default. Outside it the case is weaker. Integrations favour Zoho's own products, the sync client is less proven on very large folders, and Zoho can read what you store, as Google and Dropbox can.
What stands out
Team folders
Low cost
Zoho suite
Where it costs you
Integrations lean towards Zoho's own applications
Sync with very large folders trails Dropbox
Right for
Small companies already on Zoho that want shared team folders cheaply
Wrong for
Firms that need zero-knowledge encryption or heavy desktop sync
IndiaFree 5 GB plan; paid per user per month, minimum three users, published
Governance and hybrid storage for regulated industries
Ranked #11 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Self-hostablePublished pricingNorth America
Egnyte sells governance rather than storage. Classification, retention policy, permission control and the ability to keep some content on a local file server while the rest is in the cloud all serve organisations that have to answer regulators and clients about where documents live.
Firms in construction, pharma and finance buy it for exactly that. Prices are published per user, but lifecycle policies start at Enterprise Lite and classification sits in the quoted Ultimate tier. Without that obligation you are paying for machinery you will not use, when the products above solve the actual file-sharing problem for less.
What stands out
Content governance
Hybrid on-premise
Compliance controls
Where it costs you
Retention policies start at Enterprise Lite; classification is Ultimate only
Overkill without a governance requirement
Right for
A regulated firm that must govern and locate every file
Wrong for
A company that wants straightforward file sync and nothing more
United StatesPer user per month, published from $10 on the Team plan; top Ultimate tier quoted
Client file exchange and approvals for accountants and law firms
Ranked #12 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
ShareFile solves the client side of storage: a branded portal where a client uploads last year's statements, a request that chases missing files, an approval step and an e-signature, all logged. Accountants in particular have run on it for years.
The entry Advanced plan has only a basic portal, so e-signature and request lists mean buying Premium. As an internal drive it is ordinary and costs more per user than Dropbox for less polished sync. It is now part of Progress Software, and plans carry more workflow than many buyers need.
What stands out
Client portals
Request and sign
Professional services
Where it costs you
Priced above general storage for the same capacity
E-signature and request lists need Premium; three-user minimum
Right for
Accounting, legal and insurance firms that exchange documents with their clients
Wrong for
Companies that only need a shared drive for staff
United StatesPer user per month, published; minimum of three users
Ranked #13 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Inside Workspace, Drive is unmatched on real-time collaboration and search — finding a document by half-remembering a phrase in it still works better here than anywhere else. Outside Workspace it makes little sense.
Two caveats worth stating plainly: Google can technically access content that is not client-side encrypted, and the desktop sync client remains the weakest part of an otherwise strong product.
What stands out
Real-time collaboration
Powerful search
Suite included
Where it costs you
Google can technically access unencrypted content
Desktop sync remains the weak point
Right for
A company already on Workspace
Wrong for
An organisation with strict confidentiality requirements
United StatesPer user per month with Workspace, published
Ranked #14 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Dropbox still has the most reliable synchronisation in the category, particularly with very large folders and unreliable connections, which is why creative and engineering teams keep paying for it alongside a suite they already own.
Smart Sync saves local disk without breaking workflows. For storage alone it is priced well above the bundled options; Standard can be bought for a single user, while Advanced needs at least three.
What stands out
Best sync engine
Wide integration
Smart Sync
Where it costs you
Priced above the bundled suites for storage alone
Advanced plan needs at least three users
Right for
A team that moves very large files over poor connections
Ranked #15 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
If you already pay for Microsoft 365, OneDrive is effectively free storage with proper Office co-authoring, and for most companies that settles the question.
Version history and retention integrate with the rest of the tenant. The SharePoint foundation leaks through as path-length limits, sync errors and permission behaviour that IT ends up explaining repeatedly to users.
What stands out
Bundled
Office integration
SharePoint back end
Where it costs you
SharePoint foundations show up as path limits and sync errors
Hard to use well outside Microsoft
Right for
A company already paying for Microsoft 365
Wrong for
A team on Google or Apple
United StatesPer user per month, published; included in Microsoft 365
Ranked #16 of 16 in Best Cloud Storage for Business in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Sold on governance rather than storage, though retention, disposal and legal holds come with the Box Governance add-on and Box Shield is a further add-on, so price them in. Overbuilt and overpriced for a company that just wants a shared drive.
What stands out
Governance add-ons
Workflow engine
Compliance certifications
Where it costs you
Retention and legal hold need the Governance add-on
Overbuilt and overpriced for a shared drive
Right for
An organisation with retention, legal hold and audit requirements
Wrong for
A small team that just wants files in the cloud
United StatesPer user per month, published; minimum of three users on business plans
Cloud storage keeps files on a provider’s infrastructure, synchronises them to devices, and controls who inside and outside the organisation can open or edit them. The differences that matter are rarely in the feature list, so this is
the order we would work through them.
01
Decide whether you need a published price
16 of the 16 tools here publish what they cost; the other 0 quote per organisation. The ones you can compare without a sales call: Filen, Koofr, Internxt, pCloud, Sync.com, Tresorit, Nextcloud, Proton Drive, Jottacloud, Zoho WorkDrive, Egnyte, ShareFile, Google Drive, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Box.
02
Decide how much the jurisdiction matters
These 16 vendors are established in 8 countries across 3 regions (Europe 8, North America 7, Asia-Pacific 1). That decides whose disclosure law applies to what the vendor holds, wherever the servers are.
03
Consider whether you want the source
3 of these are open source: Internxt, Nextcloud, Proton Drive. Hosting one yourself trades a subscription for maintenance.
End-to-end encryption changes what the provider can do for you
Tresorit, Proton Drive, Filen, Internxt and Sync.com encrypt so that the provider cannot read your files. That is the strongest privacy position available and it has consequences: no server-side search of file contents, no password recovery by support, and weaker preview and collaboration.
Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive and Box hold keys they can use by default, which is why their collaboration features are better; Dropbox lists end-to-end encryption only on its Advanced plan.
Decide whether the provider being unable to read the files is a requirement or a preference.
If it is a requirement, accept that search and recovery get worse.
Test the collaboration you actually rely on, not the feature list.
Storage is the meter, seats are the bill
Almost everything here is priced per user with a storage allowance attached, so ten people each storing very little cost more than two people storing a great deal. pCloud and Internxt offer one-off lifetime purchases, which is genuinely unusual and worth modelling over five years against a subscription.
Model the bill by seats first, then check the storage allowance is sufficient.
Price a lifetime option over five years before dismissing it.
Ask what happens when the allowance is exceeded: block, overage, or upgrade.
Where the servers are and where the company is
These are two separate questions and vendors blur them. A provider may host in Frankfurt and be established in the United States, in which case its parent can be compelled regardless of where the disks spin.
Five of the products here are Swiss or German at the company level, which is a different guarantee from a European hosting region.
Ask for the contracting entity and its country, not just the data centre.
Get the sub-processor list, which is where the real answer usually is.
Check whether support staff can access content and from where.
Self-hosting is a real option in this category
Nextcloud is the reason this list is not only a list of subscriptions: it runs on your own hardware or a host you choose, which answers the jurisdiction question outright. The cost moves to running it, and that includes backups of the thing that was supposed to be your backup.
Price administration and backup alongside a licence of nil.
Confirm who patches it and how quickly after a release.
Check that the desktop and mobile clients are good enough for the people who will use them.
What goes wrong most often when buying cloud storage software
Buying end-to-end encryption and then being surprised that support cannot recover a lost password.
Checking the hosting region and not the contracting entity.
Pricing on storage when the bill is driven by seats.
Treating self-hosted storage as free, and then not backing it up.
If the jurisdiction is the deciding factor
Where a storage vendor is established decides who can compel it to hand over what it holds, and that is a different question from where the servers stand. For some buyers it is not one criterion among six but the whole decision.
This ranking is not built around that question, so it stops at the 8 European vendors that earned a place in it on the same terms as the rest. European Purpose is built around it and nothing else: a directory of European alternatives to the American services most companies default to, by category, with the country of establishment on every entry.
Its cloud storage section covers Filen, Koofr, Internxt, pCloud, Tresorit, Nextcloud, Proton Drive and Jottacloud, and the smaller providers this list has no room for.
A sister site, published by the same company as this one. Nobody buys a place on it, no placement on it is for sale either, and it sits outside our commercial arrangements — which is why this link is a plain editorial one and the vendor links on this page are not.
07
Frequently asked questions
8 answers
What is the best cloud storage in 2026?
Filen leads our ranking of 16. Zero-knowledge encryption with German hosting at prices from under two euros a month, stackable on one account, which is cheap over five years.
It is a small company with a small team, and the business features an organisation expects are largely absent.
Which cloud storage tools publish their pricing?
16 of the 16, with the pricing model each one publishes:
Filen: Free plan; monthly or annual plans by storage size, stackable, published.
Internxt: Free 1 GB plan; paid per year or one-off lifetime, published.
pCloud: Per month, per year or one-off lifetime, published.
Sync.com: Free 5 GB plan; Teams per user per month, minimum three users, published.
Tresorit: Per user per month, published.
Nextcloud: Free self-hosted; enterprise subscriptions per user per year, published.
Proton Drive: Free tier; paid per user per month, published.
Jottacloud: Free tier; paid per month or year by plan and user count, published.
Zoho WorkDrive: Free 5 GB plan; paid per user per month, minimum three users, published.
Egnyte: Per user per month, published from $10 on the Team plan; top Ultimate tier quoted.
ShareFile: Per user per month, published; minimum of three users.
Google Drive: Per user per month with Workspace, published.
Dropbox: Per user per month, published.
Microsoft OneDrive: Per user per month, published; included in Microsoft 365.
Box: Per user per month, published; minimum of three users on business plans.
The other 0 quote per organisation.
Is there a free cloud storage tool?
Filen, Koofr, Internxt, Sync.com, Nextcloud, Proton Drive, Jottacloud, Zoho WorkDrive offer a free tier or a free self-hosted edition.
Where are these cloud storage vendors established?
In 8 countries across 3 regions: Europe 8, North America 7, Asia-Pacific 1.
Filen: Germany.
Koofr: Slovenia.
Internxt: Spain.
pCloud: Switzerland.
Sync.com: Canada.
Tresorit: Switzerland.
Nextcloud: Germany.
Proton Drive: Switzerland.
Jottacloud: Norway.
Zoho WorkDrive: India.
Egnyte: United States.
ShareFile: United States.
Google Drive: United States.
Dropbox: United States.
Microsoft OneDrive: United States.
Box: United States.
Which cloud storage tools are open source?
Internxt, Nextcloud, Proton Drive.
Which cloud storage tools can you host yourself?
Nextcloud, Egnyte. The other 14 are hosted by the vendor only.
What should you use instead of Filen?
Koofr and Internxt are the next two on this page. Koofr is for Individuals and very small teams consolidating files from several US clouds; Internxt is for a privacy-motivated user moving off a US provider.
Who should not buy Filen?
A company that needs user management, roles and audit. Very small company behind it.
If your cloud storage product belongs among these 16, tell us what it does and who it is for. Inclusion is an editorial call; what a listing is and is not is set out under software advice.
