Dropbox vs Google Drive

Dropbox is a storage product judged on sync, and it has the most reliable sync engine in the category. Google Drive is the storage layer of Workspace, judged on real-time collaboration and search, with desktop sync as its weak spot. Teams handling large files offline pick Dropbox; companies that work in Workspace documents all day pick Drive.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this site; it never changes what we say about a product. How that works.

01

Dropbox and Google Drive side by side

DropboxGoogle Drive
Our cloud storage rank#14 of 16#13 of 16
Established inUnited StatesUnited States
PricingPer user per month, publishedPer user per month with Workspace, published
Free tier——
Open source——
Self-hostable——
Built forA team that moves very large files over poor connectionsA company already on Workspace
Not forA company that already pays for Microsoft 365An organisation with strict confidentiality requirements

Both are reviewed in full in our cloud storage ranking: Dropbox and Google Drive.

02

Where they differ

Dropbox 1 · Google Drive 1 · open 2
  1. 01

    Desktop sync

    This is the clearest difference. Dropbox has the most reliable synchronisation in the category, notably with very large folders and unreliable connections. Google Drive's desktop sync client is described as the weakest part of an otherwise strong product. Anyone who depends on local copies of big files staying correct should weigh this round heavily.

    Edge: Dropbox

  2. 02

    Working on documents together and finding them

    Inside Workspace, Google Drive is rated unmatched for real-time collaboration and for search, including finding a document from a half-remembered phrase. Dropbox is documented for sync, Smart Sync and wide integration rather than for co-editing. If the working day is spent in shared documents, Drive has the stronger case.

    Edge: Google Drive

  3. 03

    What you are actually paying for

    Google Drive is priced per user with Workspace and only makes sense as part of that suite. Dropbox is priced per user for storage alone, above the bundled suites, with minimum seat counts on business plans. A Workspace customer already has Drive; a company on neither has to decide whether it wants a suite or just storage.

    Depends on the buyer

  4. 04

    Confidential material

    Google can technically access content that is not client-side encrypted, and Drive is not recommended for organisations with strict confidentiality requirements. Dropbox does not escape the point: it is grouped with the providers that hold keys they can use. Neither gains an advantage, and a strict requirement points outside this pair.

    Depends on the buyer

03

When neither fits

A company that already pays for Microsoft 365 is the buyer neither suits: Dropbox is explicitly not for it and Drive belongs to a different suite. Microsoft OneDrive is effectively free in that situation and Office co-authoring works properly.

04

Dropbox or Google Drive: questions

3 answers
Is Dropbox still worth paying for if we have Google Drive?

It can be. Creative and engineering teams keep Dropbox alongside a suite they already own because its sync is more reliable with very large folders and poor connections, which is exactly where Drive's desktop client is weakest. For document-centred work, Drive alone is sufficient.

Which is better for collaboration, Dropbox or Google Drive?

Google Drive, provided you use Workspace. Its real-time collaboration and search are rated unmatched in the category. Dropbox's documented strengths are synchronisation, Smart Sync and wide integration, so it complements collaborative tools rather than replacing them.

Can we use Google Drive without Workspace instead of Dropbox?

Our assessment is that Drive makes little sense outside Workspace. If you want storage without adopting a document suite, Dropbox is the standalone product of the two, though it costs more than bundled storage and has minimum seat counts on business plans.

—

More comparisons