Backup software is judged on the one day it is used.
This guide ranks on restore speed rather than backup speed, on whether the product can survive the ransomware event that encrypts the backups too, and on what a full recovery of a working system actually involves once you are the person doing it at three in the morning.
Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.
In short
What backup software does
Backup software copies data and systems to a second location on a schedule, and restores them when the first location is gone, corrupted or encrypted.
To rank backup tools we asked, in turn, how much work setup takes, what it truly costs, whether data can be taken back out, whether leaving is possible, and who the product suits. A challenger rule applies on top. Places 1 to 3 are kept for lesser-known vendors when the category has them; large brands rank from 4. The reasoning behind the five tests, and behind having no score out of ten, is set out on the how we work page.
Rewind covers the blind spot almost every company has: the Shopify store, the accounting ledger, the GitHub organisation and the ticketing system are not backed up by anyone unless you arrange it, and the platform's own protections are not backups.
Item-level restore works well. It is narrow by design and priced per service, so covering four systems means four subscriptions.
What stands out
Backs up SaaS data
Shopify and QuickBooks
Item-level restore
Where it costs you
Narrow by design
Priced per service
Right for
A business whose critical data lives in SaaS accounts
Wrong for
A company backing up servers and laptops
CanadaPer app per month, often per user, published; free plan only for small Klaviyo and Mailchimp accounts
A single binary that does encrypted, deduplicated backups
Ranked #2 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Free tierOpen sourcePublished pricingEurope
restic does one thing extremely well: it takes a directory and puts an encrypted, deduplicated, verifiable snapshot into object storage, quickly, with a single binary and no dependencies. Engineers trust it and the restore path is genuinely reliable when it is exercised.
Everything around it is your responsibility — scheduling, retention policy, monitoring that the job ran, alerting when it did not, and rehearsing recovery. Organisations that skip those steps discover the gap at the worst possible time.
What stands out
Free
Encrypted and deduplicated
Any storage backend
Where it costs you
No interface, scheduler or reporting
No vendor and no support contract
Right for
An engineer backing up servers to object storage
Wrong for
A company that needs a console, alerts and someone to call
Incremental backup for virtual machines, open source
Ranked #3 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Free tierOpen sourcePublished pricingEurope
Proxmox Backup Server is the companion to a virtualisation platform that a lot of European companies now run instead of VMware. Incremental snapshots, deduplication across the whole datastore, verification jobs and encrypted remote sync all work well, and the paid subscription buys support rather than functionality.
Its scope is the honest limitation: this protects virtual machines and containers. Endpoints, Microsoft 365 mailboxes and SaaS data need a different product, so most organisations end up running two.
What stands out
Open source
Deduplicated VM backup
Support subscription available
Where it costs you
Aimed at Proxmox and Linux virtualisation
Nothing for endpoints or SaaS data
Right for
A company running Proxmox or KVM that wants verified VM backups
Wrong for
A business that needs laptop and Microsoft 365 protection
AustriaFree to use; support subscriptions per backup server from EUR 560 a year, published
Unlimited personal backup, and cheap object storage
Ranked #4 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Backblaze's unlimited personal plan is the best value in backup, full stop, and B2 object storage costs a fraction of what the hyperscalers charge with no egress surprise for normal use.
The published hard-drive failure statistics say something about the company's culture. Restoring a large set is slow over the internet, so plan on the shipped-drive option for genuine disaster recovery; the encrypted drive is free if returned within 30 days.
What stands out
Flat unlimited plan
B2 object storage
Published hard-drive stats
Where it costs you
Restores of large sets are slow over the internet, so a big recovery means waiting for a shipped drive
Business features are thin
Right for
Someone who wants unlimited backup or very cheap object storage
Wrong for
An enterprise needing instant recovery
United StatesPer computer per year or per TB per month, published
If you already own a Synology NAS, Active Backup is genuinely free and genuinely capable: agents for servers and PCs, virtual machine backup, and Microsoft 365 through a free companion package, with fast local restores.
There is no licence to buy. Two limits matter: it ties you to Synology hardware, and a NAS in the same building as the systems it protects is not an offsite backup until you replicate it to a second Synology NAS elsewhere.
What stands out
No licence fee
Agent for servers and PCs
Local restore speed
Where it costs you
Ties you to Synology hardware
A NAS in the same building is not offsite
Right for
A company that already owns a Synology NAS
Wrong for
An organisation needing offsite by default
TaiwanFree with a Synology NAS; you pay for the box
NAKIVO covers most of what Veeam does for roughly a third of the licence cost and will run directly on a NAS rather than needing a dedicated server, which suits a smaller IT team with a constrained budget.
Throughput is good. It has fewer integrations, a smaller partner network, and less evidence of behaviour at very large scale.
What stands out
Low licence cost
Runs on a NAS
Good throughput
Where it costs you
Fewer integrations
Less proven at large scale
Right for
A budget-conscious IT team that wants Veeam-class features
Wrong for
An enterprise needing a large partner network
United StatesPer workload subscription billed annually, or perpetual per CPU socket, published; one-year Free Edition for 10 workloads
Encrypts before it leaves the machine and writes to any storage you already pay for, which makes it the honest choice for a small technical team. The engine is community-supported; priority support comes only with Duplicati Inc's paid console, and restores deserve testing before you rely on them.
What stands out
No licence cost
Client-side encryption
Any storage back end
Where it costs you
Free use means forum support; priority support needs the paid console
Restores deserve testing before you rely on them
Right for
A small technical team that wants encrypted backup for free
Wrong for
An organisation that needs a vendor to call
SwitzerlandFree and open source (MIT); optional management console from $2 per machine per month, published
Windows backup sold as a perpetual licence, not a subscription
Ranked #8 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Published pricingEurope
Iperius does a great deal from one Windows installation: file and image backup, SQL Server and Exchange, Hyper-V and ESXi, written to disk, NAS, tape, FTP or S3-compatible storage. The perpetual licence is the reason to shortlist it, because the cost does not recur every year.
The limits come with the design. It is Windows-first, the configuration screens carry every option at once, and the vendor is a small Italian company, so plan restores and support expectations accordingly.
What stands out
Perpetual licence
Windows-centric
Italian vendor
Where it costs you
Linux and macOS coverage is limited next to its Windows features
The dense interface makes a wrong setting easy to miss
Right for
Small Windows businesses wanting a backup licence they buy once
Wrong for
Mixed Linux and Mac estates or SaaS-heavy companies
ItalyPerpetual licence per edition, published, from EUR 29 to EUR 299; free edition for basic file backup
MSP360 grew up serving managed service providers, and the model reflects it: buy licences per workload, then choose the storage yourself, or take MSP360's managed AWS or Wasabi storage. That unbundling is the reason to consider it: object storage bought directly is far cheaper than the bundled capacity most vendors sell, and you keep the ability to move.
The trade is administration. Bucket policies, lifecycle rules, immutability settings and egress charges are yours to understand, and the console, while capable across servers, endpoints and Microsoft 365, is plainer than the commercial suites.
What stands out
Bring your own storage
Wide workload support
Published licence price
Where it costs you
Bringing your own storage means managing the bucket yourself
Console is functional rather than refined
Right for
An IT provider that wants to control where backups land
Wrong for
A company that wants one bill and no storage decisions
United StatesPer computer or per endpoint subscription, published; storage bought separately or through MSP360
Polish backup platform covering servers, endpoints, Microsoft 365 and Git
Ranked #10 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
Xopero ONE puts virtual machines, physical servers, endpoints, Microsoft 365 and Git repositories under one console, which is broader than most products in the mid-market. It still offers a perpetual licence while competitors phase them out, which helps a buyer who dislikes subscriptions.
Against it: prices come by quote, the channel is partners and managed service providers, and the product is less known outside Poland, so hiring someone who already runs it will take longer.
What stands out
Perpetual option
Microsoft 365 and Git
Central console
Where it costs you
Quoted pricing, often through a partner or MSP
Smaller reference base and community outside Poland
Right for
Mid-sized firms wanting one console for servers, laptops, Microsoft 365 and Git
Wrong for
Buyers who want a published price and a self-service purchase
Acronis puts backup and active anti-ransomware in one agent, which closes the gap where malware encrypts the backups before anyone notices the primary system is gone. Bare-metal restore works.
The agent is heavy compared with pure backup tools once its security modules are enabled, although it installs only the components a plan uses, and the product range is segmented in a way that makes working out which edition you need harder than it should be.
What stands out
Swiss company
Anti-ransomware built in
Bare-metal restore
Where it costs you
The agent is heavy with the security modules installed
The product range is confusingly segmented
Right for
A company that wants backup and ransomware protection in one agent
The enterprise standard for virtual infrastructure
Ranked #12 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingNorth America
Veeam is what serious IT departments run for virtual infrastructure, and instant recovery of a virtual machine works as well as the marketing claims, which is the moment you find out whether backup software was worth the money.
Immutable backup targets are supported. Licensing is complex enough to need a specialist, with three editions and no list price, and the free Community Edition is capped at ten workloads.
What stands out
Instant VM recovery
Immutable backups
Broad platform support
Where it costs you
Licensing is complex
The free Community Edition is capped at ten workloads
Right for
An IT department running virtual infrastructure
Wrong for
A small business with a few laptops
United StatesFree tier for up to 10 workloads (Community Edition); paid per workload, quoted through resellers
Backs up things nothing else will touch, which is why it survives in banks and hospitals. NetBackup is now sold as a Cohesity product. Everything about it is heavy: the licensing, the console and the consultancy bill.
What stands out
Handles anything
Tape and cloud
Long track record
Where it costs you
Everything about it is heavy
Consultancy cost is part of the deal
Right for
A bank or hospital with an estate nobody can simplify
Enterprise data protection across everything a large estate holds
Ranked #14 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
Commvault is one of the few products that can genuinely claim to protect everything a large organisation runs: mainframe to laptop, Oracle to Microsoft 365, on-premise to three public clouds, with a single policy and retention model over the lot.
Enterprises with that spread buy it and keep it for a decade. It sits at the bottom here for the same reason it sits at the top of enterprise shortlists — the breadth comes with a licence you must negotiate, a console that rewards trained administrators, and an implementation that assumes a project team.
What stands out
Very broad coverage
Enterprise features
Partner-led delivery
Where it costs you
Complexity requires trained administrators
Quoted licensing that is hard to compare
Right for
A large enterprise protecting a heterogeneous estate under one policy
Wrong for
A company with a dozen servers and a Microsoft 365 tenant
United StatesQuoted per organisation; capacity or workload licensing; 30-day trial of Commvault Cloud
Command-line and web GUI backup with lock-free deduplication, source available
Ranked #15 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
The web-based GUI sets up backup, copy, check and prune jobs and shows a dashboard with statistical charts. Backups are encrypted on the client and deduplicated, using a lock-free design with a two-step fossil collection to delete unreferenced chunks.
Personal GUI licences are priced per computer per year, with a lower rate in later years. The command line backup command needs a licence for commercial use, while restore and manage operations do not.
What stands out
Source available
Client-side encryption
Per computer
Where it costs you
Commercial use needs a paid licence for every computer that runs backups, so costs grow with the number of machines.
The site names only local disks and SFTP servers explicitly, and describes other cloud storage only as most cloud storage services.
Right for
Individuals wanting encrypted, deduplicated backups to their own disks or SFTP servers
Wrong for
Businesses wanting one flat licence rather than a fee per computer
United StatesPer computer per year, published; command line free for personal use, commercial use needs a paid licence per computer
Open-source backup with encryption, deduplication and compression, command line or desktop app
Ranked #16 of 16 in Best Backup Software in 2026.
Open sourceSelf-hostablePricing on requestElsewhere
Kopia stores identical content once across snapshots, machines and users sharing a repository, and uses rolling-hash splitting so only changed parts of large files are uploaded. Encryption uses AES-256 or ChaCha20 before data leaves the machine.
Targets include S3-compatible storage, Azure Blob, Backblaze B2, Google Cloud Storage, WebDAV, SFTP, local disks and a self-hosted repository server. Policies control scheduling, retention and exclusions.
What stands out
Open source
Self-hostable
Client-side encryption
Where it costs you
It backs up chosen files and directories rather than whole-machine images, so bare-metal recovery needs another tool.
No company, support plan or country is named on the site, so organisations needing a contract have nobody to sign with.
Right for
Technical users wanting free encrypted file backups to storage they already control
Wrong for
Businesses needing vendor support, SLAs or full machine imaging
Not stated by the vendorNo pricing page; the software is open source under Apache 2.0 and you pay only for the storage you choose
Backup software copies data and systems to a second location on a schedule, and restores them when the first location is gone, corrupted or encrypted. The differences that matter are rarely in the feature list, so this is the order we would work through them.
01
Start with pricing transparency
Prices are public at 12 products (Rewind, restic, Proxmox Backup Server, Backblaze, Synology Active Backup, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, Duplicati, Iperius Backup, MSP360 Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Veeam, Duplicacy) and on request at the remaining 4, so budget time for quotes if your favourite is in that second group.
02
Look at where the vendor sits
The vendors on this page are based in 9 countries (North America 8, Europe 6, Asia-Pacific 1, Elsewhere 1). The country of the contracting company sets which authorities can ask it for your data, whatever the hosting region.
03
Consider whether you want the source
4 of these are open source: restic, Proxmox Backup Server, Duplicati, Kopia. Hosting one yourself trades a subscription for maintenance.
A backup you have not restored is not a backup
This is the whole category in one sentence. Every product here copies data; the one that matters is the one that puts it back under pressure, from a machine that no longer exists, at three in the morning.
The restore path is what you are buying and it is the thing almost nobody tests until they need it.
Restore a real file, a real folder and a whole machine during the trial.
Time the full restore. That number is your actual recovery objective.
Test a restore to different hardware, which is the scenario you will face.
Ransomware changed what backup has to survive
Modern ransomware looks for the backups first. The defences are immutability, so a backup cannot be altered or deleted for a fixed period, and separate credentials, so the account that runs the backup is not the account an attacker takes over.
Veeam, Acronis and NAKIVO sell immutability explicitly; a scripted copy to a network share has neither.
Ask whether backups can be made immutable and for how long.
Confirm the backup system uses its own credentials, not a domain administrator.
Check whether deletion requires a second approval or a delay.
Licence, storage and egress are three separate bills
MSP360 licenses the software and bills storage separately; Backblaze bundles both; the open source tools, restic, Duplicati and Proxmox Backup Server, cost nothing and leave the storage bill entirely to you. Egress is the one that ambushes people: some object storage charges to read data back, which is precisely the moment you cannot negotiate.
Price licence, storage and egress separately for a full restore.
Ask what a complete recovery would cost in egress fees.
Check whether backup data is compressed and deduplicated before it is stored.
The three-two-one rule and what people forget in it
Three copies, two media, one off-site remains the right shape, and the part that gets skipped is off-site. A NAS in the same building as the servers is a second copy, not a disaster recovery plan.
Synology Active Backup is excellent and on-site unless you replicate it to a second NAS elsewhere, which makes it on its own half of an answer rather than a whole one.
Confirm one copy is in a different building or region.
Check that SaaS data is covered too: a Microsoft 365 tenant is not backed up by Microsoft.
Write down the recovery point and recovery time you actually need, then test against them.
What goes wrong most often when buying backup software
Never testing a restore. It is the only test that matters and the one that gets postponed.
Keeping every copy in the same building, or reachable with the same credentials.
Forgetting SaaS. Mailboxes, files and repositories in someone else's cloud are your responsibility.
Budgeting for storage and not for the egress a full restore would cost.
07
Frequently asked questions
8 answers
What is the best backup software in 2026?
Our ranking of 16 puts Rewind first. Covers the blind spot: your Shopify store, your accounting ledger and your GitHub organisation are not backed up by anyone unless you do it. Narrow by design, and priced per service.
Which backup tools publish their pricing?
The ones that do, with the model each states:
Rewind: Per app per month, often per user, published; free plan only for small Klaviyo and Mailchimp accounts.
restic: Free open source.
Proxmox Backup Server: Free to use; support subscriptions per backup server from EUR 560 a year, published.
Backblaze: Per computer per year or per TB per month, published.
Synology Active Backup: Free with a Synology NAS; you pay for the box.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication: Per workload subscription billed annually, or perpetual per CPU socket, published; one-year Free Edition for 10 workloads.
Duplicati: Free and open source (MIT); optional management console from $2 per machine per month, published.
Iperius Backup: Perpetual licence per edition, published, from EUR 29 to EUR 299; free edition for basic file backup.
MSP360 Backup: Per computer or per endpoint subscription, published; storage bought separately or through MSP360.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Per workload per year, published.
Veeam: Free tier for up to 10 workloads (Community Edition); paid per workload, quoted through resellers.
Duplicacy: Per computer per year, published; command line free for personal use, commercial use needs a paid licence per computer.
Everything else on the list is priced on request.
Is there a free backup tool?
Rewind, restic, Proxmox Backup Server, Synology Active Backup, Duplicati, Veeam come with a no-cost entry point, a free plan or a self-hosted edition.
Where are these backup software vendors established?
Vendor countries on this page, North America 8, Europe 6, Asia-Pacific 1, Elsewhere 1:
Rewind: Canada.
restic: Germany.
Proxmox Backup Server: Austria.
Backblaze: United States.
Synology Active Backup: Taiwan.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication: United States.
Duplicati: Switzerland.
Iperius Backup: Italy.
MSP360 Backup: United States.
Xopero ONE: Poland.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Switzerland.
Veeam: United States.
Cohesity NetBackup: United States.
Commvault: United States.
Duplicacy: United States.
Kopia: Not stated by the vendor.
Which backup tools are open source?
restic, Proxmox Backup Server, Duplicati, Kopia.
Which backup tools can you host yourself?
Kopia. The other 15 are hosted by the vendor only.
What should you use instead of Rewind?
Look at restic (made for an engineer backing up servers to object storage) and Proxmox Backup Server (made for a company running Proxmox or KVM that wants verified VM backups), which hold places two and three.
Who should not buy Rewind?
A company backing up servers and laptops. Narrow by design.
Missing from this backup software ranking? Contact us with a short description of the product and its users. Adding it is an editorial choice, and software advice explains what a listing does and does not involve.
