Snov.io vs Skrapp

The real split is how each vendor lets you spend credits. Skrapp deducts a credit only when an address comes back marked Valid or Catch-all, lets unused credits roll over and keeps them after you cancel. Snov.io runs three separate meters, credits, recipients and enrichment tokens, and wraps finding, verifying, warm-up and sending into one subscription with unlimited team seats. Skrapp starts on a free plan with 50 credits, while Snov.io starts on a Trial plan that renews monthly. One is a focused email finder, the other a full outbound suite.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

01

Snov.io and Skrapp side by side

Snov.ioSkrapp
Our lead generation software rank#4 of 15#2 of 15
Established inUnited StatesSingapore
List price, 7 November 2026Trial plan renewing monthly (50 credits, 100 recipients), then Starter, Pro S/M/L and Ultra billed monthly, 3-monthly or yearly; LinkedIn slots extraFree: 50 credits, 1 user. Professional from 2,000 credits a month, Enterprise from 50,000, monthly or yearly
Free tier—Yes
Open source——
Self-hostable——
Built forSmall outbound teams wanting finder, verifier and sequencer under one subscriptionSmall teams building email lists from LinkedIn on a tight, flexible budget
Not forBuyers who only want to look up emails occasionallyTeams that need mobile numbers or a full database

Both are reviewed in full in our lead generation software ranking: Snov.io and Skrapp.

02

Where they differ

Snov.io 1 · Skrapp 3 · open 2
  1. 01

    Credits that fail versus credits that stick

    Skrapp's FAQ says credits are charged only for emails marked Valid or Catch-all, so a search that fails costs nothing. It also says unused credits roll over and stay with you after cancelling, with no lock-in contract. Snov.io's pricing page lists credits as one of three separate meters and shows shared credits across the team, but the Snov.io material we read is silent on rollover of unused credits or the cost of a failed lookup. Skrapp is clearer here.

    Edge: Skrapp

  2. 02

    One meter or three

    Snov.io's pricing page lists credits, recipients and enrichment tokens as separate meters. A bigger prospect list needs more credits, a bigger send needs more recipients, and enrichment draws on tokens, so you have to forecast all three before choosing between Starter, Pro S, M and L, or Ultra. Skrapp's table is built around one unit, credits per month, with Professional starting at 2,000 and Enterprise at 50,000. If you want budgeting you can do on one line, Skrapp wins.

    Edge: Skrapp

  3. 03

    Testing it before paying

    Skrapp's free plan gives 50 credits and one user, along with the Email Finder, Email Verifier and the LinkedIn, Sales Navigator and Recruiter extensions, so you can test the real workflow. Snov.io's Trial plan renews monthly with 50 credits, 100 recipients, 25 enrichment tokens and one warm-up slot, yet it withholds integrations, bulk search, API and export. A trial that cannot export or connect to your tools tests less. Skrapp's free plan wins this round.

    Edge: Skrapp

  4. 04

    Verification and what happens after the find

    Snov.io lists seven-tier email verification, email warm-up and a Sales CRM in its plans, so a found address can be checked, warmed up for and mailed without leaving the product. Skrapp lists an Email Verifier on the free plan and says it finds emails and company data, but its plan table shows no sending tool and no phone numbers. If your job ends at a clean list, Skrapp is enough. If it continues to sending, Snov.io covers more.

    Edge: Snov.io

  5. 05

    Exports, integrations and the paid gate

    Skrapp places List Exports and List CRM Sync under the paid Professional plan, and puts the API and SSO on Enterprise, which has 15 users and 50,000 credits per month at its lowest step. Snov.io gates integrations, bulk search, API and export behind the paid tiers, and every paid plan includes unlimited team seats. LinkedIn automation is extra, charged per slot per month, with a free seven-day trial. Neither one hands out these features free, so the round is level.

    Depends on the buyer

  6. 06

    Billing terms and who stands behind it

    Skrapp's plans bill monthly or yearly, take cards through Stripe, and give no refunds for partial months. Its terms list a Singapore address and the name Skrapp.io but no legal entity. Snov.io bills monthly, every three months or annually, and its terms name Snovio Inc, incorporated under US law with a New York address, under Delaware law. Snov.io names its company more plainly and Skrapp does not, while Skrapp is more flexible on commitment, so on balance neither wins outright here.

    Depends on the buyer

03

When neither fits

If you only need an occasional lookup, or you want a vendor that also sells phone numbers, neither fits well. Hunter is a simpler finder to compare, and Dropcontact is worth a look if you want a third option for list cleaning.

04

Snov.io or Skrapp: questions

3 answers
What happens to credits I do not use this month?

Skrapp's FAQ says unused credits roll over and remain after you cancel. For Snov.io, no rollover rule for credits, recipients or tokens appears in what we read. Check that with Snov.io before buying a larger tier.

Will I be charged when a search finds nothing?

On Skrapp, no, because credits are charged only for emails marked Valid or Catch-all. Snov.io states no cost for a failed lookup. It does say credits are shared across the team and sit alongside recipients and enrichment tokens.

Is either tool clear about where the company is based?

Snov.io's terms say Snovio Inc is incorporated under US law, with a registered address in New York and Delaware governing law.

Skrapp's terms list an address in Singapore and the name Skrapp.io, but no legal entity. If you need a named contracting party, ask Skrapp for it in writing.

—

Sources

Checked 7 November 2026
—

More comparisons