Greenhouse vs Workable

Greenhouse publishes three plans with no figures and asks you to book a demo, while Workable prints its plan prices and offers a 15-day trial. The other split is philosophy: Greenhouse enforces structured interviewing, Workable aims to get a team hiring quickly with sourcing built in.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

01

Greenhouse and Workable side by side

GreenhouseWorkable
Our applicant tracking rank#11 of 14#4 of 14
Established inUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
List price, 4 November 2026Core, Plus and Pro, quoted on request; no figures on the pricing pageStandard $299, Premier $599, Enterprise $719 per month; annual totals $3,588, $7,188, $8,628; 15-day trial
Free tier——
Open source——
Self-hostable——
Built forAn organisation willing to adopt structured interviewingA team that needs to be hiring properly by next week
Not forA small team that hires occasionallyA company that wants deep funnel analytics

Both are reviewed in full in our applicant tracking ranking: Greenhouse and Workable.

02

Where they differ

Greenhouse 1 · Workable 2 · open 1
  1. 01

    Seeing a price before a call

    Workable's page shows Standard at $299 a month, Premier at $599 and Enterprise at $719, with annual totals of $3,588, $7,188 and $8,628. Greenhouse's page shows no currency, period or amount for Core, Plus or Pro, only a demo button. A buyer comparing budgets can start with Workable straight away.

    Edge: Workable

  2. 02

    Trying it first

    Workable offers a 15-day trial without a credit card, though the trial leaves out Workable Agent. Greenhouse's pricing page names neither a free plan nor a trial. If you want hands on a product before committing, Workable is the easier route.

    Edge: Workable

  3. 03

    How opinionated the hiring process is

    Greenhouse is built around interview kits plus scorecards fixed ahead of the first candidate conversation, with an audit log on Pro and a business intelligence connector on Plus. Workable covers sourcing, a careers page, evaluation and offers, but its reporting shows counts per stage. For process discipline and reporting, Greenhouse goes further.

    Edge: Greenhouse

  4. 04

    What grows the bill

    Workable bands its plans by employee count, from 1 to 20 up to 1000+, and texting, video interviews and assessments are paid add-ons on Standard. Greenhouse quotes by hiring volume and complexity, so the cost depends on a negotiation. Neither is cheap to scale, and neither is fully predictable.

    Depends on the buyer

03

When neither fits

If you hire a handful of people a year and want something light, look at Homerun or Teamtailor instead.

04

Greenhouse or Workable: questions

3 answers
Does Greenhouse publish its prices?

No. Core, Plus and Pro appear without amounts, and the page says pricing is customised to your hiring needs.

Is Workable a European product?

Its terms name Workable Software Limited at a London address under English law, and the page does not state the country of incorporation.

Which has a trial?

Workable gives 15 days with no credit card. Greenhouse's pricing page mentions none.

—

Sources

Checked 4 November 2026
  • Greenhouse pricing page: three plan names, no published prices, demo only, no free plan or trial named, Plus and Pro features.
  • Greenhouse legal page: Master subscription agreement and data processing addendum as customer contracts.
  • Workable pricing page: monthly and annual plan prices, headcount bands, 15-day trial, add-ons on Standard.
  • Workable terms: Workable Software Limited, London address, English law.
—

More comparisons