Sirvoy vs Hotelogix

Sirvoy and Hotelogix both run a cloud property management system, but they meet a buyer very differently. Sirvoy publishes a free one-unit plan, a EUR 12 Starter tier and a EUR 44 Pro tier with the channel manager. Hotelogix shows no prices and quotes by property size and integrations, with channel manager, GDS connectivity and central reservations in the bundle. A small hostel can budget its first year from a table at Sirvoy, while a multi-property group may find more at Hotelogix once a quote arrives. Hotelogix shows no trial, only a demo request and a contact route.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

01

Sirvoy and Hotelogix side by side

SirvoyHotelogix
Our hotel property management software rank#1 of 13#11 of 13
Established inIrelandSingapore
List price, 8 November 2026EUR 0 for one unit, then EUR 12 (Starter) or EUR 44 (Pro) a month; yearly billing is cheaperSubscription quoted by email, set by property size and integrations; no figures published
Free tierYes—
Open source——
Self-hostable——
Built forHostels, B&Bs and small hotels that want published prices and no contractMulti-property operators wanting PMS, distribution and a booking engine together
Not forProperties that need a channel manager on the cheapest tierSingle small properties comparing public price lists

Both are reviewed in full in our hotel property management software ranking: Sirvoy and Hotelogix.

02

Where they differ

Sirvoy 4 · Hotelogix 2 · open 0
  1. 01

    What you can try without paying

    Sirvoy's free plan covers one unit with up to 5 extras, a free website, a direct booking engine, online payments and automated guest emails. Paid plans add a trial of 14 days, no card needed. Hotelogix mentions no free trial anywhere we looked, only a demo request and a contact link. For a property testing the water before paying, Sirvoy removes far more of the risk. Hotelogix may offer more after a sales call, though nothing published confirms it.

    Edge: Sirvoy

  2. 02

    The EUR 44 question

    Sirvoy lists Starter at EUR 12 a month, or EUR 11 billed yearly, and Pro at EUR 44, or EUR 41 yearly. Its homepage separately says pricing starts from $9 per month and scales per room, with no full table, so the pricing page is the figure to trust. Hotelogix prices by size and integrations, and the pages show nothing. Sirvoy gives a number to plan around. Neither vendor's page states a currency for Hotelogix, so any comparison has to wait for a written quote.

    Edge: Sirvoy

  3. 03

    Channel manager and distribution

    Sirvoy puts its channel manager, team permissions and guest history under Pro, and the homepage says it connects to Booking.com, Airbnb and Expedia to prevent double bookings. An extra channel-connected property costs EUR 20 a month. Hotelogix lists a channel manager with real-time OTA management, GDS connectivity and a marketplace of 100+ integrations. For distribution depth across channels, Hotelogix names the wider set. That makes Hotelogix a stronger fit once a business sells through global distribution systems and several OTAs.

    Edge: Hotelogix

  4. 04

    More than one hotel

    Hotelogix lists multi-property pricing, central reservations for several properties, and revenue management inside the suite, plus POS and housekeeping. It also has separate Independent Property and Multi-Property pricing pages. Sirvoy's pages show extra properties as a paid add-on and say little about group tools. Sirvoy's pages describe no central reservation office. A group should lean towards Hotelogix. Single-property owners will rarely need that, but chains and groups will. Multi-property buyers should ask for that scope in writing, module by module.

    Edge: Hotelogix

  5. 05

    Messages and add-on charges

    Sirvoy bills text messages pay as you go, at EUR 0.06 on Pro and EUR 0.10 on Starter, and charges for every extra connected property. Invoicing and basic accounting begin at Starter. Hotelogix's add-ons are tied to the third-party integrations a quote includes, and the figures are given only by email. Sirvoy's extras are at least visible and can be added up before signing. That helps a small owner compare total cost across vendors early. Hotelogix may differ once quoted.

    Edge: Sirvoy

  6. 06

    Where each company sits

    Sirvoy Ltd is a private company with its registered office in Dublin, Ireland, begun in 2008 by three brothers building software for their mother's hostel in Sweden, and still family run. Hotelogix describes itself as a cloud hospitality company based in Singapore, founded in 2008, with no owner stated. It quotes 99.7% uptime and 24/7 support. Europe-minded buyers get the Irish company. The pages we read also do not state a parent company for Hotelogix, which limits any ownership comparison.

    Edge: Sirvoy

03

When neither fits

If you need a channel manager on the cheapest tier, or an open-source system you host yourself, neither fits well. Beds24 is a lower-cost channel manager option, and QloApps is the open-source route.

04

Sirvoy or Hotelogix: questions

3 answers
Does Sirvoy charge setup fees or ask for a contract?

The pricing page states no written contracts, setup fees or commissions. Paid plans start with a free 14-day trial, no card. Yearly billing saves 8%.

Why would two hotels get different Hotelogix quotes?

The pricing is a subscription that varies with property size and the third-party integrations a hotel needs. The site shows no prices and sends detailed pricing questions to its support address. No standard rate card is published.

Is Hotelogix only a cloud product?

The pages describe it as cloud based, helping hotels move to the cloud since 2008, and mention no on-premise option. Sirvoy's homepage says it is hosted on Amazon Web Services and shows PCI DSS, SSL and GDPR badges. Licence terms are stated by neither.

—

Sources

Checked 8 November 2026
—

More comparisons