Sentry alternatives: 11 application performance monitoring tools compared

Teams look for a Sentry alternative when event-based quotas start to drive the bill, when they want full infrastructure monitoring next to error tracking, or when they want to run the whole stack on their own servers with real support. They move to flat or request-based tools, to broader observability platforms, or to self-hosted open source.

Short answer: The closest replacements for Sentry in our application performance monitoring ranking are AppSignal, Raygun and SigNoz. Choose AppSignal if you run a Ruby, Elixir, Node.js or Python app and want a predictable bill with unlimited users. All 11 alternatives below are ranked products from Best Application Performance Monitoring Software in 2026, and each says where it differs from Sentry.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this site; it never changes what we say about a product. How that works.

Sentry

#7 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking

  • Pricing: Free plan for one user; paid plans with error, span and replay quotas, published; self-hosted available
  • Established in: United States
  • Built for: Development teams that want release-linked errors before they want traces
  • Not for: Infrastructure monitoring or a single-pane operations view
01

Why buyers look past Sentry

  1. 01

    Quotas count events, and spikes use them up

    Sentry prices by quota of errors, spans and session replays. The Developer plan is free for one user and includes 5k errors, 5M spans and 50 session replays. The Team plan starts at $26 a month billed annually with 50k errors. A noisy release or a retry loop can consume a month of errors in an afternoon, so teams with unpredictable volume look at tools with fixed tiers or published per-GB rates.

  2. 02

    Application focus, not the whole estate

    Sentry documents errors, tracing, session replay, profiling, logs, metrics, uptime and cron monitoring. It is built around the application and the developer. Teams that also need infrastructure, Kubernetes and network views, or one query layer across several data types for operations staff, often end up on a platform that covers hosts as well.

  3. 03

    Self-hosting is possible but not supported

    Sentry can be self-hosted, which attracts teams with data-residency rules. The documentation is direct about the terms: the licence is the Functional Source License (not OSI open source, converting to Apache 2.0 after two years), it needs at least 4 CPU cores and 16 GB RAM plus 16 GB swap, and it comes with no guarantees or dedicated support. Some features, including the Seer AI features, are not available self-hosted.

02

11 alternatives at a glance

Closest replacement first
AlternativeHeadquartersFree optionPricing Key differenceSwitch ifOur rank
AppSignalNetherlandsYesFree plan with 30K requests a month; paid plans by request volume, publishedApplication monitoring for Ruby, Elixir, Node and Python teamsyou run a Ruby, Elixir, Node.js or Python app and want a predictable bill with unlimited users#5
RaygunNew ZealandNo free tierPer product by monthly event or trace volume, publishedCrash reporting, real user monitoring and APM from one small vendoryou want crash reporting and user-experience monitoring as distinct, separately budgeted products#8
SigNozIndiaNo free tierOpen source self-hosted; cloud from USD 49 a month, priced per GB ingested, publishedOpenTelemetry-first tracing you can install on your own clusteryou want to self-host an observability stack, or pay per GB ingested instead of per event quota#2
Grafana CloudUnited StatesYesFree tier; Pro has a monthly platform fee plus usage on metrics, logs and traces and per active user, publishedHosted version of a stack you are allowed to run yourselfyou already use Grafana dashboards and want errors, metrics and logs in one place#1
HoneycombUnited StatesYesFree tier; per event ingested per month, publishedQuery wide events rather than stare at dashboardsyour problem is understanding slow or odd behaviour across services, not triaging exceptions#6
New RelicUnited StatesYesFree tier of 100 GB a month; then per GB ingested plus per core and full-platform user, publishedIngest-priced platform with a genuinely usable free allowanceyou want application and infrastructure monitoring in one platform and few people need full access#11
DatadogUnited StatesYesFree tier to 5 hosts; per host per month plus per GB of logs and per custom metric, publishedEvery observability product in one bill, and one consoleyou already run infrastructure on Datadog and want errors to sit beside hosts and logs#13
Dash0GermanyNo free tierUsage-based per million spans, log records and metric data points, published; 14-day trialOpenTelemetry-native observability with the meter shown per spanyou instrument with OpenTelemetry and want usage-based pricing with budget limits#4
TidewaysGermanyNo free tierBy monthly request volume in published tiers; 14-day trialPHP profiling and monitoring for Symfony, Laravel and Shopwareyour application is PHP and you want profiling with a fixed monthly price#9
Elastic ObservabilityNetherlandsNo free tierConsumption-based on ingest and retention, published ratesLogs, traces and metrics in one searchable storeyou already store logs in Elastic and want traces and alerts on the same data#3
DynatraceAustriaNo free tierConsumption-based per host hour or memory-GiB hour and per GiB ingested, published ratesAutomatic dependency mapping from a single agent per hostan operations organisation needs one commercial platform across many hosts and containers#10
03

What each one does differently

AppSignal

Netherlands · Free plan with 30K requests a month; paid plans by request volume, published

AppSignal is the closest in spirit: error tracking and performance monitoring for application teams, but with plans by request volume and no overage charges (the vendor says it only enforces limits after two of three months over). The free plan covers 30K requests with 5-day retention. It is narrower in scope than Sentry on session replay and profiling.

Switch from Sentry if you run a Ruby, Elixir, Node.js or Python app and want a predictable bill with unlimited users.

AppSignal, #5 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Raygun

New Zealand · Per product by monthly event or trace volume, published

Raygun sells crash reporting, real user monitoring and APM as three separate products, each with its own plan and reserved event volume, and all start with a 14-day trial rather than a free plan. Overage is charged per error, session or trace. It costs more to combine products than Sentry's single bundle.

Switch from Sentry if you want crash reporting and user-experience monitoring as distinct, separately budgeted products.

Raygun, #8 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

SigNoz

India · Open source self-hosted; cloud from USD 49 a month, priced per GB ingested, published

SigNoz is an OpenTelemetry-based observability tool with a free self-hosted Community edition and a cloud Teams plan from $49 a month that includes $49 of usage, then $0.30 per GB for logs and traces. There are no per-user or per-host charges. It is built around traces, logs and metrics rather than Sentry's issue-triage workflow.

Switch from Sentry if you want to self-host an observability stack, or pay per GB ingested instead of per event quota.

SigNoz, #2 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Grafana Cloud

United States · Free tier; Pro has a monthly platform fee plus usage on metrics, logs and traces and per active user, published

Grafana Cloud bundles metrics, logs, traces and profiles with a free tier (50 GB of logs and 50 GB of traces a month, 14-day retention, three active users). The Pro plan adds a $19 platform fee plus usage. It leans on the Grafana dashboard ecosystem and is a toolkit to assemble, where Sentry is a ready-made error workflow.

Switch from Sentry if you already use Grafana dashboards and want errors, metrics and logs in one place.

Grafana Cloud, #1 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Honeycomb

United States · Free tier; per event ingested per month, published

Honeycomb is built for exploring high-cardinality trace data in production, not for grouping and assigning errors. The free tier allows 20M events a month, and Pro starts at $150 a month for up to 750M events, with unlimited seats on every plan. Its debugging workflow is query-driven rather than issue-driven.

Switch from Sentry if your problem is understanding slow or odd behaviour across services, not triaging exceptions.

Honeycomb, #6 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

New Relic

United States · Free tier of 100 GB a month; then per GB ingested plus per core and full-platform user, published

New Relic bills by data ingested and by user: 100 GB a month and one full platform user are free, then $0.40 per GB, with full platform users priced per seat on paid editions. It covers hosts, containers and logs without host-based charges. The per-seat cost for full users is a different pressure from Sentry's event quotas.

Switch from Sentry if you want application and infrastructure monitoring in one platform and few people need full access.

New Relic, #11 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Datadog

United States · Free tier to 5 hosts; per host per month plus per GB of logs and per custom metric, published

Datadog charges per host for APM (from $31 a month when added to infrastructure monitoring, billed annually, $36 standalone) and per GB or event for logs, with Error Tracking included alongside APM. It is a full operations platform, a large step up in scope and in billing dimensions from Sentry's quota model.

Switch from Sentry if you already run infrastructure on Datadog and want errors to sit beside hosts and logs.

Datadog, #13 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Dash0

Germany · Usage-based per million spans, log records and metric data points, published; 14-day trial

Dash0 prices telemetry per million units: spans, logs and web events at $0.06 ingestion plus $0.54 storage, with 30-day retention. It has a 14-day trial and no free plan. It is OpenTelemetry-oriented and aimed at operations teams, and it does not centre on the developer-facing error inbox that Sentry provides.

Switch from Sentry if you instrument with OpenTelemetry and want usage-based pricing with budget limits.

Dash0, #4 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Tideways

Germany · By monthly request volume in published tiers; 14-day trial

Tideways is a PHP profiler and monitor from Berlin, priced by monthly request volume in tiers from 5M to 1B requests, with no overage pricing and a 14-day trial. It does one language well and does not cover the JavaScript, mobile and session replay breadth that Sentry documents.

Switch from Sentry if your application is PHP and you want profiling with a fixed monthly price.

Tideways, #9 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Elastic Observability

Netherlands · Consumption-based on ingest and retention, published rates

Elastic Observability serverless bills on data ingested and retained, with logs from about $0.07 per GB ingested and $0.017 per GB-month retained on Logs Essentials, and more on the Complete tier. It is built on search and log analytics rather than error grouping, and needs more setup than Sentry's SDK-first onboarding.

Switch from Sentry if you already store logs in Elastic and want traces and alerts on the same data.

Elastic Observability, #3 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

Dynatrace

Austria · Consumption-based per host hour or memory-GiB hour and per GiB ingested, published rates

Dynatrace is an enterprise platform billed through an annual commitment with a published rate card, for example $58 a month per 8 GiB host for Full-Stack Monitoring. It offers a 15-day trial and automatic discovery of hosts and services. It suits large estates, and is far heavier than a developer-first error tool.

Switch from Sentry if an operations organisation needs one commercial platform across many hosts and containers.

Dynatrace, #10 of 15 in our application performance monitoring ranking →

04

When Sentry is still the right choice

Sentry stays the right choice when developers are the main users and the question is which exception broke in which release. Issue grouping, release tracking, session replay and tracing sit in one product, there are unlimited users on paid plans, and the free Developer plan lets one person start without a card. If event volume is steady and fits a plan's quota, the quota model is predictable rather than a problem.

05

What moving off Sentry involves

  1. 01

    SDKs and releases are re-instrumented

    Error tracking depends on an SDK in each application and on release and source-map uploads in your build. Plan to swap the SDK per service, re-upload source maps or debug symbols, and re-create alert rules. Run the new tool in parallel for a release cycle before removing Sentry.

  2. 02

    Issue history does not travel

    Resolved issues, assignments and regression history are stored in Sentry. Export what you need for audit or recurring-bug research before the plan ends, and check the retention you have today (30 days on the Developer plan, up to 90 on Team and Business) against what the new tool keeps.

06

Questions about replacing Sentry

5 answers
Is there a free alternative to Sentry?

SigNoz offers a free self-hosted Community edition, and Sentry itself can be self-hosted under its Functional Source License.

Grafana Cloud, Honeycomb, AppSignal and New Relic each have a free tier with limits on data, events or requests. Free self-hosting trades licence cost for the work of running it.

Can I self-host Sentry?

Yes. The documentation lists at least 4 CPU cores, 16 GB RAM plus 16 GB swap and 20 GB disk, and states that self-hosted Sentry has no guarantees or dedicated support. Some features, such as Seer, are not included.

Is Sentry open source?

Not by the OSI definition. It uses the Functional Source License, which the vendor calls Fair Source, and the code becomes Apache 2.0 after two years. You cannot resell it or use it competitively against Sentry.

Which Sentry alternative has the most predictable pricing?

AppSignal prices by request volume with no overage charges, and Tideways charges exactly the agreed tier with no overage pricing. Both are narrower than Sentry. Usage-based tools such as SigNoz, Dash0 and Elastic publish per-unit rates, so the bill follows volume.

Do I need a full observability platform instead of Sentry?

Only if you also need infrastructure, Kubernetes and log analytics in the same place. Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace and Grafana Cloud cover that wider scope. If your pain is application errors, a platform adds cost and setup without solving it.

—

Sources

Checked 8 October 2026
—

Who wrote this

Last reviewed 8 October 2026

Tomasz Wierzbicki

Data & Market Research · Krakow, Poland

Builds the market data: where a number comes from, what it counts, and what it leaves out.

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Sets the research method, decides what gets ranked, and answers for what is published.

Hannah Reiter

Senior Analyst, Business Applications · Vienna, Austria

Covers CRM, ERP and the operational software that runs a company day to day.

Written by Tomasz Wierzbicki, edited by Sebastiaan Smits and fact-checked by Hannah Reiter. Last reviewed 8 October 2026. How we review.

—

Sentry head to head

—

Alternatives to other products