Appwrite alternatives: 11 backend as a service platforms compared

Teams look for an Appwrite alternative when the Free plan's hard stop gets in the way, when they want a Postgres or GraphQL core, or when they need a backend that matches one language or one kind of product. Options range from a single binary you host yourself to managed platforms with usage billing.

Short answer: Nhost, PocketBase and Backendless head the list of Appwrite alternatives drawn from our backend as a service platform ranking. Smaller vendors fill the top three places where the category offers them, and the household names start at place 4. Nhost is the one to try if you want a European vendor and a Postgres database with GraphQL. Each of the 11 alternatives sits in Best Backend as a Service Platforms in 2026 and is described against Appwrite.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

Appwrite

#1 of 13 in our backend as a service platform ranking

  • Pricing: Free plan with 2 projects; Pro plan with a budget cap; published database tiers
  • Established in: Israel
  • Built for: Teams that want one backend product they can host themselves or rent
  • Not for: Teams that want SQL and a plain Postgres to leave with
01

Why buyers look past Appwrite

  1. 01

    The Free plan stops instead of stretching

    Appwrite's pricing page says that on a Free organisation, reaching a resource limit freezes the project and turns the Console read-only. Recovery means upgrading to Pro, deleting resources over the limit or waiting for the next billing cycle. A prototype that gets a traffic spike can therefore go dark.

  2. 02

    Pro spend depends on a cap you set

    On Pro the project keeps running past a limit and extra charges apply, with email reminders at 75% and 100%. The billing docs add that when a budget cap is reached and bandwidth is the limit, API access is denied until you raise the cap or upgrade. Teams that want a fixed bill compare other pricing models.

  3. 03

    Databases are priced as separate tiers

    Dedicated databases run from a 1 core, 1 GB tier at 10 dollars a month up to a 32 core, 256 GB tier at 4,099 dollars. High-availability replicas cost the full tier price each, and point-in-time recovery adds 20% of the base price. Teams with a database preference already settled often look for a backend built around it.

02

11 alternatives at a glance

Ranked: challengers ahead of household names
AlternativeHeadquartersFree optionPricing model Switch ifOur rank
NhostSwedenYesPublishedyou want a European vendor and a Postgres database with GraphQL#2
PocketBaseNot stated by the vendorNo free tierSee profileyou want the smallest thing that you can host yourself, for a side project#13
BackendlessUnited StatesYesPublishedyou may switch between hosted and self-managed and want both from one vendor#4
Back4appUnited StatesYesPublishedyour existing code speaks Parse or you want pricing counted per app#5
EncoreSwedenYesPublishedyou prefer defining the backend in code and keeping it inside your own cloud account#8
SupabaseSingaporeYesPublisheda relational Postgres core with SQL matters more than a document model#3
ConvexUnited StatesYesPublishedlive-updating queries in TypeScript appeal and you want a documented export#6
XanoUnited StatesYesPublishedyou build APIs visually and want plans measured in workspaces and records#7
HasuraUnited StatesYesPublishedyou already own a database and only need an API layer on top#9
Heroic LabsUnited StatesNo free tierPublishedyou are building a multiplayer or live-service game#10
FirebaseUnited StatesYesPublishedyou want Google's ecosystem and are happy to put a card on Blaze#12
03

What each one does differently

Nhost

Sweden · Published

Nhost AB is a Swedish company whose backend is built on Postgres, with an instant GraphQL API and Git-based deployments that include CI/CD. Starter is free with one project, 1 GB of database and 10 functions, while Pro adds metered usage beyond what is included. We did not see a trial or a licence stated on its homepage.

Switch from Appwrite if you want a European vendor and a Postgres database with GraphQL.

Nhost comes 2 of 13 when backend as a service platform products are ranked here →

PocketBase

Not stated by the vendor · See profile

PocketBase is one executable holding an embedded SQLite database, REST API, realtime subscriptions, authentication and file storage, under the MIT licence. Its documentation says it has no full backward compatibility before v1.0.0 and is not yet advised for production-critical work. No company is named, only its creator, so support means community channels.

Switch from Appwrite if you want the smallest thing that you can host yourself, for a side project.

Check PocketBase in the ranked list (13 out of 13, backend as a service platform) →

Backendless

United States · Published

Backendless Corp. in Texas offers three routes: a cloud with a free plan, a self-installed Pro edition with free licensing, and a managed edition with round-the-clock monitoring. That spread lets a team start hosted and change later. Its pricing page does not list paid prices, and its privacy policy says data moves to the United States.

Switch from Appwrite if you may switch between hosted and self-managed and want both from one vendor.

Check Backendless in the ranked list (4 out of 13, backend as a service platform) →

Back4app

United States · Published

Back4app, Inc. runs a managed backend compatible with Parse, generating GraphQL, REST and SDK endpoints. The free plan needs no credit card but is capped at one app, 25K requests a month and 250 MB of data. Paid plans are priced per app and billed annually, with overage rates listed on the page.

Switch from Appwrite if your existing code speaks Parse or you want pricing counted per app.

Why Back4app is #5 among 13 backend as a service platform products →

Encore

Sweden · Published

Encoretivity AB of Stockholm sells a framework in which you write the backend in code and it provisions managed services in your own AWS or GCP account. Data and exit stay in your cloud. Starter is free, Pro has a 14-day trial without a card, and fair-use caps apply, such as 100,000 requests a day per app.

Switch from Appwrite if you prefer defining the backend in code and keeping it inside your own cloud account.

Encore holds rank 8 among 13 entries in our backend as a service platform guide →

Supabase

Singapore · Published

Supabase gives each project a dedicated Postgres instance, and its documentation includes migration guides from Firebase Auth and Firestore. The contracting entity is Supabase Pte. Ltd. in Singapore. Free projects pause after a week of inactivity, and a self-hosted install runs one project without managed backups, branching or the Management API.

Switch from Appwrite if a relational Postgres core with SQL matters more than a document model.

Open the Supabase profile, 3rd of 13 in the backend as a service platform guide →

Convex

United States · Published

Convex bundles a reactive database, file storage, authentication and vector search in every plan, and functions are written in TypeScript. A zip export comes from the convex export command, and the backend can be self-hosted under a fair-source licence that bars a competing hosted product. Professional is billed per developer.

Switch from Appwrite if live-updating queries in TypeScript appeal and you want a documented export.

Open the Convex profile, 6th of 13 in the backend as a service platform guide →

Xano

United States · Published

Xano, Inc. in California builds its plan ladder on workspaces, seats and database size: Free has one workspace and 100,000 records, Essential three workspaces and 10 GB, and Pro five workspaces and 25 GB. An enhanced-security add-on covers HIPAA and BAA. The service is proprietary, so portability depends on where you deploy.

Switch from Appwrite if you build APIs visually and want plans measured in workspaces and records.

Full verdict on Xano, which sits at number 7 of 13 for backend as a service platform →

Hasura

United States · Published

Hasura, Inc. of San Francisco sells an API layer, its Data Delivery Network, placed over databases you already own. The homepage lists APIs, GraphQL and PromptQL, not storage or login. Billing counts active models, meaning those queried more than 1,000 times a month, and DDN Free allows one supergraph developer.

Switch from Appwrite if you already own a database and only need an API layer on top.

Hasura comes 9 of 13 when backend as a service platform products are ranked here →

Heroic Labs

United States · Published

GameUp Online, Inc., trading as Heroic Labs, makes backend tooling for games: Nakama servers, Satori for live operations with event capture and flags, and Hiro for in-game currencies. Nakama OSS can be installed with Docker or run on Heroic Cloud. For ordinary business apps the game features add little.

Switch from Appwrite if you are building a multiplayer or live-service game.

See the full Heroic Labs entry, ranked 10 of 13 among backend as a service platform products →

Firebase

United States · Published

Firebase runs under Google Cloud terms and United States law. The Spark plan needs no payment method and gives Firestore 1 GiB with 50K reads and 20K writes a day. Cloud Functions are unavailable on Spark, phone sign-in is billed per SMS, and managed Firestore export needs the Blaze plan.

Switch from Appwrite if you want Google's ecosystem and are happy to put a card on Blaze.

Firebase holds rank 12 among 13 entries in our backend as a service platform guide →

—

Which alternative for which situation

  1. 01

    You want a European vendor on Postgres

    Nhost: Nhost AB is Swedish, with a GraphQL API on Postgres and a free Starter with one project.

  2. 02

    You want to host a small backend yourself

    PocketBase: One MIT-licensed executable bundles SQLite, auth and file storage, with a pre-1.0 caveat in its docs.

  3. 03

    You want the backend inside your own cloud account

    Encore: Services are provisioned in your AWS or GCP account, with a free Starter plan.

  4. 04

    You are leaving Firebase or a document store for SQL

    Supabase: Its docs carry migration guides from Firebase Auth and Firestore onto dedicated Postgres.

  5. 05

    You are building a multiplayer game

    Heroic Labs: Nakama, Satori and Hiro target game servers, live operations and in-game economies.

04

When Appwrite is still the right choice

Appwrite stays a sensible choice when you want one set of tools on every plan, a BSD-3-Clause codebase and a documented self-hosting route with Docker or the official Helm chart for Kubernetes. If your worry is only the Free plan freeze, a Pro plan with a budget cap keeps the project running, so weigh that before rebuilding.

05

What moving off Appwrite involves

  1. 01

    Auth users and database documents need a mapping

    Export users, collections and files, then map the data to the target's tables or documents. Password hashes and session tokens may not carry over, so plan a reset or a staged sign-in migration and test it with a copy of production data.

  2. 02

    Functions and realtime clients change

    Server functions use another runtime model on most platforms, and Appwrite's client SDK calls must be replaced. List each function, trigger and realtime subscription before choosing, and estimate the rewrite per client app.

06

Questions about replacing Appwrite

6 answers
What happens when an Appwrite Free project hits its limit?

The pricing page says the project freezes and the Console becomes read-only. You can upgrade to Pro, remove resources over the limit, or wait for the next billing cycle reset.

Does Appwrite Pro have a spending cap?

You can set a budget cap on the organisation. The billing docs say Appwrite buys more resources automatically until the cap is reached, and that API access is denied if bandwidth hits the cap.

How much do Appwrite database tiers cost?

Dedicated tiers listed on the pricing page start at 10 dollars a month for 1 core and 1 GB and rise to 4,099 dollars for 32 cores and 256 GB. Serverless has no fixed fee and includes 10 dollars of monthly compute credits.

Which alternative is easiest to self-host?

PocketBase ships as a single executable with MIT licensing, though its docs warn it is pre-1.0. Supabase, Convex and Backendless also describe self-hosting, each with limits stated on their pages.

Which alternative is nearest to Firebase?

Firebase itself is in our list. Supabase documents migration paths from Firebase Auth and Firestore, and Convex offers a reactive database for teams that like live queries.

Is there a European backend platform here?

Nhost AB is established in Sweden and Encoretivity AB, behind Encore, is in Stockholm. Vendor country is not the same as data location, so read each hosting statement.

—

Sources

Checked 9 November 2026
  • Appwrite pricing: Free freeze and read-only Console, Pro continues with charges, budget cap, database tiers from 10 to 4,099 dollars, replica and recovery pricing.
  • Appwrite Pro billing docs: Budget cap behaviour and bandwidth denial.
  • Appwrite self-hosting docs: Docker and Kubernetes Helm self-hosting.
  • Nhost: Nhost AB, Postgres, GraphQL, Git deployments, Starter limits.
  • PocketBase docs: Single executable, SQLite, pre-1.0 warning, MIT.
  • Backendless: Cloud, Pro and managed routes, United States data transfer.
  • Back4app: Parse-compatible backend, free plan limits, per-app plans.
  • Encore: Own AWS or GCP account, Starter, Pro trial, fair-use caps.
  • Supabase: Dedicated Postgres per project, Firebase migration guides, pause and self-hosting limits.
  • Convex: Reactive database, export command, fair-source licence.
  • Xano: Workspace, record and size steps, enhanced security add-on.
  • Hasura: DDN, active-model billing, DDN Free.
  • Heroic Labs: Nakama, Satori, Hiro, Heroic Cloud.
  • Firebase pricing: Spark quotas, Blaze, Functions and export requirements.
—

Who wrote this

Last reviewed 9 November 2026

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder · Amsterdam, Netherlands

Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page on this site; research and drafting are AI-assisted.

Author and fact-checker: Sebastiaan Smits. This page was last reviewed on 9 November 2026; our review process is public.

—

Alternatives to other products