A virtual event platform runs a conference rather than a session: several tracks at once, sponsors who paid for something, and attendees who came to meet each other.
This guide ranks the platforms on what the per-event quote leaves out, whether the attendee and lead data comes back to you, and where the line with cheaper webinar software falls.
AuthorHannah ReiterSenior Analyst, Business Applications
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry
says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a
vendor. How that works.
In short
What virtual event platform software does
A virtual event platform hosts a multi-session programme online, handling registration, parallel tracks, sponsor presence, attendee networking and the reporting that sponsors and organisers expect afterwards.
In this order: setup effort, what it really costs, how your data comes back out, whether
you can leave, and who each virtual event platform tool is built for. Why those five, and why there is no
score out of ten, is on the how we work page.
Annual contract, quoted, often bundled with video products
—
Large broadcasts whose recordings become a permanent searchable video library
A small organiser running two events a year
Country is where the vendor is headquartered or contracts from, which is a
different question from where your data is hosted. Where the two tell different stories, the
entry says so.
French event platform built around matchmaking and scheduled meetings
Ranked #1 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
Swapcard is bought for what happens between sessions. The recommendation engine, meeting requests and schedules hold up at trade-show scale, and exhibitors can be shown a number of conversations at the end, which is what renews a sponsorship.
The organiser side is less polished: building the public event site is fiddly, onsite hardware is newer than the software, and every price comes through a salesperson. Because attendee data is the sensitive part, ask where it is hosted and which sub-processors handle it.
What stands out
Matchmaking
EU vendor
Hybrid capable
Where it costs you
Event website and registration are weaker than the app
No published pricing at any tier
Right for
Conferences and trade shows where meetings are the measurable outcome
Wrong for
A single-track broadcast with no networking element at all
FranceAnnual licence priced per attendee and exhibitor, quoted; branded app and onsite hardware are add-ons
Finnish platform where the agenda exists to create meetings
Ranked #2 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
Brella treats the agenda as scaffolding for meetings, and the matchmaking is simple enough that attendees actually use it rather than abandoning it after the first session.
For organisers selling sponsor packages by lead volume it is the easiest product here to prove value with. The rest of the platform is unremarkable by choice, so an event whose value is the content will be paying for machinery it never runs.
What stands out
Networking first
EU vendor
Sponsor meetings
Where it costs you
Content and streaming features are deliberately ordinary
Poor value for events without networking goals
Right for
Sponsor-funded events that are measured in meetings booked per exhibitor
Wrong for
Broadcast-style conferences where nobody needs an introduction at all
FinlandQuoted per event, tiered by attendee numbers
Map-based rooms where attendees move between tables themselves
Ranked #3 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Remo is the platform in this category a team can most easily buy, configure and run in an afternoon, with the price on the website, monthly billing and a 14-day trial. The table-based floor gives small events something closer to the conversational mess of a real room.
Past 1,000 attendees it moves to a quoted enterprise plan, sponsor tooling stops at banners, and it suits several parallel tracks less well than the conference suites, and the novelty wears thin for attendees who only wanted to listen.
What stands out
Published price
Table networking
Capacity tiers
Where it costs you
Self-serve plans stop at 1,000 attendees per event
The floor plan metaphor tires passive audiences
Right for
Workshops and networking sessions bought without a sales call first
Wrong for
Large multi-track conferences with serious sponsor and booth requirements
United StatesPublished: Starter from $299 a month, one-off events from $699, enterprise quoted; 14-day trial
Austrian platform for brokerage events and B2B matchmaking programmes
Ranked #4 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
b2match has quietly become the default for EU-funded matchmaking and cluster events, because it produces exactly the statistics those programmes have to report and it sells single-event licences alongside annual ones.
Organisers with two events a year need not pay for the other fifty weeks. The attendee experience is functional rather than enjoyable, and any event whose success depends on production values will find the platform side thin.
What stands out
Matchmaking
EU vendor
Per-event price
Where it costs you
Production and streaming quality trail the American suites
Interface favours administrators over attendees
Right for
Funded brokerage events that must report their bilateral meeting counts
Wrong for
Polished consumer-facing conferences with heavy production values throughout
AustriaSingle-event or 12-month licence, priced by participant package
The former Hopin events product, now owned by RingCentral
Ranked #5 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
This is still the most complete single-vendor answer for a conference with stages, sessions, an expo floor and networking, and the onsite side means hybrid is not a bolt-on. The concern is direction rather than capability.
Hopin built it, RingCentral bought it, and the roadmap now competes for attention inside a communications company. Ask for the product roadmap in writing and check what shipped in the last year before signing a multi-year deal.
What stands out
Multi-track
Hybrid capable
Changed owner
Where it costs you
Owned by a company whose core business is telephony
Annual commitment even when billed monthly
Right for
A mid-sized multi-track conference bought from one vendor rather than three
Wrong for
Organisations wary of another change of product ownership
United StatesPublished from $99 per organiser a month with an annual commitment; 30-day trial
Swiss event platform built around CRM sync and sales follow-up
Ranked #6 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestEurope
SpotMe is based in Lausanne and was named a Leader in Forrester's 2024 wave for event management platforms. Its pitch is data: sessions, meetings and engagement flow into the CRM so field teams can act on them, and it has launched a product aimed at life sciences.
Branded apps are included on higher plans. The flip side is scale: pricing assumes a programme of events, and configuration takes weeks rather than days.
What stands out
CRM sync
European vendor
Life sciences
Where it costs you
Priced for event programmes rather than a single conference
More setup work than lighter platforms such as Remo
Right for
A B2B or life-sciences marketing team running many events per year
Wrong for
An association running one annual conference on a tight budget
SwitzerlandPlans by number of events a year, from 2 to 25 or custom, all quoted
B2B event and webinar platform licensed per organiser, not per event
Ranked #7 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
Zuddl is a US company with an Indian subsidiary in Hyderabad. Its licence covers organisers, not events, so the cost is known before the calendar is. Registration, ticketing, onsite check-in and webinars sit on one platform, with the mobile app sold as an add-on.
Additional collaborators cost $170 a month billed annually, and virtual attendee volume is priced separately. The model rewards volume: a team with two events a year pays for capacity it does not use. Check how attendee and lead data exports to your CRM before signing the annual contract.
What stands out
Per-organiser licence
Webinars included
B2B marketing
Where it costs you
Annual commitment is steep for a team running one event
A younger vendor than Swapcard or Webex Events
Right for
A B2B marketing team running webinars, field events and a conference
Wrong for
An organiser who needs one virtual event this year
United StatesPublished: from $10,000 a year for two organisers, plus platform fee and add-ons
Cisco's event platform, formerly Socio, with strong onsite tooling
Ranked #8 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
The former Socio product does the operational side of events better than the virtual side: the attendee app is genuinely good, and onsite registration with badge printing works without a separate supplier.
Cisco ownership clears most security reviews automatically, which shortens procurement in regulated organisations. Against that, the naming across Webex Meetings, Webinars and Events confuses buyers, and the contract process is a Cisco contract process.
What stands out
Event app
Onsite badges
Cisco backed
Where it costs you
Virtual features are competent rather than distinctive
Confusing overlap between several Webex products
Right for
Hybrid events where badges and the mobile app matter most
Wrong for
Small teams hoping to avoid enterprise procurement entirely
Rendered virtual venues with staffed booths and a service team
Ranked #9 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
vFairs sells the exhibition hall as a picture and a project manager as the delivery method, and for recruitment fairs and supplier expos that combination works: booths get staffed, leads get captured, and the organiser is not alone on the day.
The illustrated venue does little for attendance numbers. Read the quote line by line, because chat, video, gamification and integrations are frequently separate items.
What stands out
Virtual booths
Managed service
Career fairs
Where it costs you
Rendered venues add less for attendees than for sales decks
Most capabilities are separately priced add-ons
Right for
Career fairs and trade shows that want a managed service
Wrong for
Teams that want to configure everything for themselves
United StatesQuoted per event, with add-ons priced separately
Singapore platform with modular registration, badges and virtual venues
Ranked #10 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Free tierPublished pricingAsia-Pacific
GEVME is strong where most platforms are weakest, in registration workflows and onsite check-in, and it has the regional presence to support events across Asia properly.
Bought from outside Asia, the advantages thin out: support runs on Singapore hours, the partner network is small, and the modular price list means a realistic configuration of Omnichannel, Registration and onsite hardware costs well above the published entry prices. Price the full set, including extra attendees, early.
What stands out
Modular
APAC focus
Registration strong
Where it costs you
Support hours and partners are concentrated in Asia
Modules and attendee overages add up above the entry price
Right for
Events run from Asia that need registration and onsite operations
Wrong for
Organisers outside Asia wanting support in their own time zone and local contracts
SingaporeFree plan; paid plans published from USD 1,050 a year, billed annually
The old Hubilo address now leads to Brandlive's Virtual PRO event platform
Ranked #11 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Published pricingNorth America
The Hubilo website now redirects to Virtual PRO from Brandlive Inc., a Portland company that also runs Brandlive and Webinar Plus, and the site does not explain what became of the Hubilo product.
What is sold today is a virtual events platform with branded registration, sponsor booths and lounges, breakouts and CRM integrations that push attendee activity to HubSpot, Salesforce or Marketo. Pricing is published and annual, set by admin seats and a per-event audience cap. Existing Hubilo customers should confirm the migration path in writing.
What stands out
Marketing focus
Lead scoring
Annual contract
Where it costs you
The Hubilo brand now redirects to Brandlive's Virtual PRO
Entry plan is $15,000 a year with a 1,000-attendee cap
Right for
Marketing teams reporting event performance as pipeline in the CRM
Wrong for
Complex multi-track conferences with large exhibition floors and booths
United StatesPublished annual plans by admin seats, from $15,000 a year with a 1,000-attendee cap
API-first event platform used by retail and consumer brands
Ranked #12 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Published pricingLatin America
Eventtia is closer to an events API with an interface attached, which suits retail and luxury brands running hundreds of store events and boutique sessions with registration embedded in their own website. That is a real and underserved need.
As a standalone conference platform it is unremarkable, matchmaking sits on the dearest published plan, and without developer time the main advantage never materialises. EU customers contract with an Estonian entity and are hosted in the EU, which helps with data protection reviews.
What stands out
API first
EU hosting
Brand events
Where it costs you
Requires developer time to get the value
Matchmaking needs the top Networking plan
Right for
Brands running many small events from one central template and API
Wrong for
A one-off conference with no engineering resources available
ColombiaPublished annual licence from $1,650 for 250 attendees; enterprise quoted per admin user
Broad event suite covering travel, registration and virtual sessions
Ranked #13 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
InEvent covers the parts other platforms ignore, particularly attendee travel, flights and hotels, which is exactly what a company flying two hundred staff to a sales kickoff needs.
The price of that coverage is that no single module is the best available, and the administration interface assumes somebody will spend real time learning it. Good as an event operations system, ordinary as a virtual venue.
What stands out
Wide scope
Travel module
Quoted price
Where it costs you
Individual modules feel less finished than specialists
Dense interface with a long configuration time
Right for
Internal corporate events that involve travel, hotels and accommodation logistics
Wrong for
A single conference where depth matters more than breadth
United StatesSingle-event or annual subscription, quoted
Video platform first, event platform second, built for broadcast quality
Ranked #14 of 14 in Best Virtual Event Platform in 2026.
Pricing on requestNorth America
Kaltura's reason to exist is video at scale, and events sit on top of infrastructure that streams reliably to very large audiences and keeps the content searchable afterwards.
For universities and enterprises already running Kaltura video, adding events is sensible. For everyone else the event tooling is the oldest-feeling in this list, the setup is slow, and the commercial model assumes a wider relationship you may not want.
What stands out
Video quality
Enterprise
Annual contract
Where it costs you
Event layer is dated and slow to configure
Enterprise contract, usually bundled with other products
Right for
Large broadcasts whose recordings become a permanent searchable video library
Wrong for
A small organiser running two events a year
United StatesAnnual contract, quoted, often bundled with video products
A virtual event platform hosts a multi-session programme online, handling registration, parallel tracks, sponsor presence, attendee networking and the reporting that sponsors and organisers expect afterwards. The differences that matter are rarely in the feature list, so this is
the order we would work through them.
01
Decide whether you need a published price
6 of the 14 tools here publish what they cost; the other 8 quote per organisation. The ones you can compare without a sales call: Remo, RingCentral Events, Zuddl, GEVME, Virtual PRO (formerly Hubilo), Eventtia.
02
Decide how much the jurisdiction matters
These 14 vendors are established in 7 countries across 4 regions (North America 8, Europe 4, Asia-Pacific 1, Latin America 1). That decides whose disclosure law applies to what the vendor holds, wherever the servers are.
The line between a webinar and a virtual event platform
Buyers cross this line by accident and pay for it. One presenter, one room, one hour is a webinar, and webinar software costs a monthly subscription. A virtual event platform exists for what a webinar cannot do: sessions running in parallel, a programme people navigate, sponsors with something to sell, and attendees who need to find each other.
Swapcard, Brella and b2match are bought almost entirely for that last point. The price difference is not incremental. A conference platform is usually an annual licence or a per-event quote, often through a sales process, and lands several times above a year of webinar software. Before asking for quotes, write down how many things happen simultaneously and whether anyone needs an introduction.
Count parallel sessions: one means you are buying a webinar tool.
Ask whether sponsors are buying leads or logo placement.
If nobody needs to meet anyone, skip this category entirely.
What the per-event quote leaves out
Most platforms here quote rather than publish, and the first quote is a starting position. The items that appear later are predictable: registration pages beyond the basic template, a branded mobile app, onsite check-in and badge printing, streaming beyond a bundled number of hours, extra languages, single sign-on, and integration into the CRM.
vFairs and GEVME price modules separately by design, so an entry number and a realistic number differ substantially. Remo, Zuddl, RingCentral Events, Eventtia and GEVME publish entry prices, which sets the first budget line but not the add-ons. Ask for a quote against your full requirement list, including the hybrid elements you think you might add, and ask what a second event in the same year costs.
Request the quote for the full configuration, not the entry package.
Ask the price of a second and third event on the same contract.
Check whether streaming hours or attendee minutes are capped.
Networking is the feature that justifies the price
Content can be streamed by anything. The reason to pay conference money is that two people who should meet actually do. Look at how matching works: Brella and Swapcard build a profile from interests and let attendees request meetings with a shared calendar; b2match runs structured bilateral slots that funded programmes have to report on; Remo uses a floor plan of tables instead.
Then check the exhibitor side, because sponsors renew based on the conversations they got, not on the impressions. A platform that cannot show an exhibitor who visited their booth and what was said will cost you the sponsorship the following year.
Ask how a meeting request becomes an accepted calendar invitation.
Test the matchmaking with fifty realistic profiles, not five.
Confirm what lead report each exhibitor receives, and when.
Attendee data, sponsor leads and the week after
Registration data for a European conference is a GDPR file with a joint controller problem attached, because sponsors also want it. Decide before the event what an exhibitor receives, get consent at the booth rather than assuming it, and check that the platform records the consent alongside the lead.
Then check the exports: session attendance, poll answers, meeting outcomes and video should all leave as files you can keep. Platforms hosted in Europe such as Swapcard, Brella, b2match and Eventtia make the data protection assessment shorter; the American suites usually need a transfer assessment and a look at the sub-processor list. Recordings are often deleted when the event licence ends.
Agree exactly what sponsors receive, and capture consent for it.
Export attendance, meetings and recordings before the licence closes.
Ask for the sub-processor list and hosting region during procurement, not after.
What goes wrong most often when buying virtual event platform software
Buying a conference platform for what is really a monthly webinar, then paying per event for tracks, booths and networking nobody uses.
Accepting the entry quote as the price, when registration, the mobile app, badge printing and streaming hours are separate lines.
Promising sponsors a lead list the platform cannot produce with consent attached.
Letting the licence expire with the recordings, meeting data and attendee list still inside the platform.
07
Frequently asked questions
6 answers
What is the best virtual event platform in 2026?
Swapcard leads our ranking of 14. The networking engine is the reason to buy it: recommended contacts, meeting requests and a schedule that survives a busy trade show.
The event website and registration side is less impressive than the app, badge and onsite tooling has grown quickly rather than matured, and pricing still arrives through a salesperson rather than a page.
Which virtual event platform tools publish their pricing?
6 of the 14, with the pricing model each one publishes:
Remo: Published: Starter from $299 a month, one-off events from $699, enterprise quoted; 14-day trial.
RingCentral Events: Published from $99 per organiser a month with an annual commitment; 30-day trial.
Zuddl: Published: from $10,000 a year for two organisers, plus platform fee and add-ons.
GEVME: Free plan; paid plans published from USD 1,050 a year, billed annually.
Virtual PRO (formerly Hubilo): Published annual plans by admin seats, from $15,000 a year with a 1,000-attendee cap.
Eventtia: Published annual licence from $1,650 for 250 attendees; enterprise quoted per admin user.
The other 8 quote per organisation.
Is there a free virtual event platform tool?
GEVME offer a free tier or a free self-hosted edition.
Where are these virtual event platform vendors established?
In 7 countries across 4 regions: North America 8, Europe 4, Asia-Pacific 1, Latin America 1.
Swapcard: France.
Brella: Finland.
Remo: United States.
b2match: Austria.
RingCentral Events: United States.
SpotMe: Switzerland.
Zuddl: United States.
Webex Events: United States.
vFairs: United States.
GEVME: Singapore.
Virtual PRO (formerly Hubilo): United States.
Eventtia: Colombia.
InEvent: United States.
Kaltura Events: United States.
What should you use instead of Swapcard?
Brella and Remo are the next two on this page. Brella is for Sponsor-funded events that are measured in meetings booked per exhibitor; Remo is for Workshops and networking sessions bought without a sales call first.
Who should not buy Swapcard?
A single-track broadcast with no networking element at all. Event website and registration are weaker than the app.
If your virtual event platform product belongs among these 14, tell us what it does and who it is for. Inclusion is an editorial call; what a listing is and is not is set out under software advice.
