Lattice alternatives are sought by HR teams that find a modular, US-dollar price list harder to plan around than they expected, and by organisations outside the United States that want a vendor invoicing in their own currency. They move to lighter review tools, to OKR-first products, or to the other full talent suites.
Sebastiaan SmitsFounderShort answer: The first three alternatives to Lattice in our performance management ranking are Leapsome, Small Improvements and Perdoo. Places 1 to 3 go to challengers, vendors outside the best-known brands in a category, wherever the category has them; the established names follow from place 4 in their ranked order. Choose Leapsome if you want a full talent suite billed in euros from a European vendor. All 12 alternatives below are ranked products from Best Performance Management Software in 2026, and each says where it differs from Lattice.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this site; it never changes what we say about a product. How that works.
Lattice publishes its prices per seat per month by product: Performance at $10, Goals & OKRs at $8, Engagement at $4, with Compensation (+$6) and Grow (+$4) as add-ons. A team that wants reviews, goals, an engagement survey and pay planning adds those lines together, and enterprise pricing is a quote. The page is clear, but the total depends on how many modules end up in the contract.
Lattice states a minimum annual agreement of $4,000 and bills in United States dollars only. For a company of 30 people that floor shapes the choice of plan; for a European company it means a dollar invoice for a tool that stores personal data about its staff. Several alternatives below bill in euros or publish per-user prices without a floor.
Lattice describes itself as a platform with an AI agent for HR, analytics, compensation and career tracks. Teams that only run an annual review and a goal cycle may find that most of this sits unused, and ask whether a narrower tool does the same job for a lower price.
| Alternative | Headquarters | Free option | Pricing | Key difference | Switch if | Our rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapsome | Germany | No free tier | Per employee per month by module, quoted | Reviews, goals, learning and surveys as separate modules | you want a full talent suite billed in euros from a European vendor | #2 |
| Small Improvements | Germany | No free tier | Per user per month by plan, billed annually, published; 20-user minimum | Reviews, one-to-ones and praise without a platform to configure | a company of 20 to 200 people wants a plain feedback and review tool at a low per-user price | #1 |
| Perdoo | Germany | Yes | Per user per month, published; free tier | Strategy map and OKRs with published pricing and EU hosting | goals and strategy alignment matter more than formal review cycles | #6 |
| 15Five | United States | No free tier | Per user per month by product, billed annually, published | Weekly check-ins that turn into the review nobody dreads | manager coaching and a published all-in price per user are the priority | #4 |
| Betterworks | United States | No free tier | Per user per month by plan, published; Enterprise quoted, annual | Enterprise goal alignment with calibration and heavy reporting | calibration and succession planning for a larger workforce outweigh engagement surveys | #14 |
| PerformYard | United States | No free tier | Per person per month by product, published range, billed annually | Configurable review cycles for HR teams with existing forms | review forms and cycles are unusual and need configuring rather than adopting | #3 |
| Engagedly | United States | No free tier | Per user per month by suite, published ranges; $7,500 annual minimum | Reviews, goals, learning and recognition as add-on suites from one vendor | you run 360 reviews and 9-box talent grids and have enough staff to clear the minimum | #10 |
| Quantum Workplace | United States | No free tier | Quoted by employee count; $15,000 annual minimum | Engagement surveys, reviews, goals and recognition in one HR product | engagement surveying and recognition are the main need and performance reviews follow | #9 |
| Weekdone | Estonia | No free tier | Per user per month, published; free for small teams | OKR tracking with weekly plans, for teams not appraisals | weekly check-ins and OKRs for a small team are enough and EU data storage is required | #7 |
| Workpath | Germany | No free tier | Modular, quoted per organisation | OKR, KPI and strategy execution software for large European organisations | you need to steer company KPIs and initiatives, not run employee review cycles | #12 |
| Elevo | France | No free tier | Per employee per year, quoted | French review software shaped around the entretien annuel | your HR team works in French and wants reviews, skills and compensation in one tool | #11 |
| Primalogik | Canada | No free tier | Two plans, quoted on request; 25-user minimum | 360 feedback and appraisals at a price small teams afford | you need 360 feedback and reviews for at least 25 people with a quoted, small-vendor price | #8 |
Germany · Per employee per month by module, quoted
Leapsome is headquartered in Berlin and prices per employee per month by module, with performance reviews at 7 euros and goals and OKRs at 4 euros on its pricing page. It also sells an HRIS foundation and recruiting module, which Lattice's price list does not show. The module list is long, so the total depends on what you add.
Switch from Lattice if you want a full talent suite billed in euros from a European vendor.
Germany · Per user per month by plan, billed annually, published; 20-user minimum
Small Improvements, based in Berlin, publishes three plans at $3, $6 and $9 per user per month billed annually, with minimums of 20, 20 and 30 users. It centres on reviews, 360 feedback, 1:1s, goals and pulse surveys, and has no compensation module or HR agent. A 30-day free trial is offered.
Switch from Lattice if a company of 20 to 200 people wants a plain feedback and review tool at a low per-user price.
Small Improvements, #1 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
Germany · Per user per month, published; free tier
Perdoo (Perdoo GmbH) starts from strategy: strategy maps, OKRs and KPIs come first and reviews and check-ins sit around them. It has a free plan for up to 5 users, then Premium at 6.40 euros and Supreme at 8 euros per user per month billed annually. It is less a review-cycle tool than Lattice's performance module.
Switch from Lattice if goals and strategy alignment matter more than formal review cycles.
United States · Per user per month by product, billed annually, published
15Five splits its price list into Engage at $4, Perform at $11 and Total Platform at $16 per user per month billed annually. Perform includes OKRs and goals, 360 feedback, a talent matrix and career paths, with a manager-coaching AI layer. It has no compensation product on the page we read, which Lattice lists as an add-on.
Switch from Lattice if manager coaching and a published all-in price per user are the priority.
United States · Per user per month by plan, published; Enterprise quoted, annual
Betterworks lists Performance at $8 and Performance plus Talent Intelligence at $9 per user per month, covering goals and OKRs, feedback, review cycles and 1:1s, then adding calibration, succession and skills data. Enterprise is quoted. Its focus is goal evidence and calibration rather than the wider HR platform Lattice describes.
Switch from Lattice if calibration and succession planning for a larger workforce outweigh engagement surveys.
Betterworks, #14 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
United States · Per person per month by product, published range, billed annually
PerformYard prices its Performance product and its Talent Development suite at $5 to $15 per person per month and gives every customer a named support specialist at no charge. Its strength is configurable review processes, with meetings, goals and surveys around them. Compensation sits in the separate Talent Development suite.
Switch from Lattice if review forms and cycles are unusual and need configuring rather than adopting.
PerformYard, #3 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
United States · Per user per month by suite, published ranges; $7,500 annual minimum
Engagedly offers a Performance Suite at $5 to $8 per user per month billed annually, with a minimum of $7,500 per year. It includes 360 feedback, 9-box assessments, calibration and OKRs. The minimum is nearly double Lattice's $4,000 floor, so it fits mid-sized companies better than small ones.
Switch from Lattice if you run 360 reviews and 9-box talent grids and have enough staff to clear the minimum.
Engagedly, #10 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
United States · Quoted by employee count; $15,000 annual minimum
Quantum Workplace is quoted by employee count with a stated minimum annual contract of $15,000, nearly four times Lattice's floor. It leads with engagement surveys and adds performance, development, recognition and rewards. It is a purchase for organisations with several hundred staff, not for a small HR team.
Switch from Lattice if engagement surveying and recognition are the main need and performance reviews follow.
Quantum Workplace, #9 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
Estonia · Per user per month, published; free for small teams
Weekdone, founded in Tallinn, is built around weekly progress reports and OKRs. It is free for up to 3 users with all features included, and states that data is stored in the EU. It offers 1:1 style conversations and recognition but has no review-cycle, calibration or compensation modules.
Switch from Lattice if weekly check-ins and OKRs for a small team are enough and EU data storage is required.
Germany · Modular, quoted per organisation
Workpath (Workpath GmbH, Munich) is an operating-model tool for KPIs, goals, initiatives and resources, priced modularly on request. It handles company strategy execution and not employee reviews or feedback, so it replaces Lattice's goals module only.
Switch from Lattice if you need to steer company KPIs and initiatives, not run employee review cycles.
France · Per employee per year, quoted
Elevo is a French talent platform (Montreuil) covering annual reviews, objectives, people reviews, 360 feedback, training, skills, eNPS and compensation, in French first. It publishes no prices on the pages we read, and has announced a combination with Assessio. Its documentation and support are French-language first.
Switch from Lattice if your HR team works in French and wants reviews, skills and compensation in one tool.
Canada · Two plans, quoted on request; 25-user minimum
Primalogik sells two bundles, Feedback and Performance, quoted on request after a form, with a minimum of 25 users and two months off for yearly subscriptions. Its tools are 360 feedback, performance reviews, goals and OKRs, check-ins and an employee journal. It is lightweight and has no compensation or engagement-suite depth.
Switch from Lattice if you need 360 feedback and reviews for at least 25 people with a quoted, small-vendor price.
Primalogik, #8 of 14 in our performance management ranking →
Lattice remains the right choice when one platform should cover reviews, goals, engagement, compensation and career tracks, and the product-by-product price list suits the size of the company. Each product is priced openly and the contract includes dedicated customer success support. If you already run several of its modules, the cost of splitting them across vendors will usually exceed what a narrower tool saves.
Past review cycles, goal histories and feedback are the data least likely to move cleanly. Ask for a full export well before renewal, and decide which cycles need to remain searchable. Some vendors, such as Perdoo, offer data migration help; ask each one what they import.
Templates, rating scales, calibration rules and goal cascades belong to the tool's own model. Expect to recreate them, and use the move to drop forms nobody reads. Run one pilot cycle with a single department before cutting over the whole company.
Lattice bills in US dollars with a $4,000 annual floor. Compare each alternative's currency, minimum contract and where employee data is stored, since the answer differs sharply between Weekdone's free tier and the $15,000 floor at Quantum Workplace.
It suits smaller organisations that need reviews, 360 feedback and 1:1s at a low per-user price: $3 to $9 per user per month, with a 20 to 30 user minimum.
It does not offer a compensation module, so teams that use Lattice's pay planning must keep that elsewhere.
Leapsome and Small Improvements are both based in Berlin, Perdoo is a German GmbH, Workpath is in Munich, Elevo in France and Weekdone in Estonia.
Leapsome and Perdoo publish prices in euros. Whether any of them fits your data requirements is a question for their data processing terms.
Small Improvements starts at $3 per user per month and Perdoo has a free plan for up to 5 users. Weekdone is free for up to 3.
Compare the full price for the modules you use, since Lattice's per-product prices are low individually and total depends on the combination.
Lattice states a minimum annual agreement of $4,000. Engagedly states $7,500 per year, Quantum Workplace $15,000 per year, Primalogik a 25-user minimum, and Small Improvements 20 to 30 users depending on plan. Perdoo and Weekdone have no stated floor.
Perdoo and Weekdone are built around OKRs, and Workpath handles company-level KPIs and initiatives. Leapsome, 15Five and Betterworks include OKRs inside a wider performance suite.
Its pricing page shows paid products and a request-a-demo route and does not list a free plan. Perdoo and Weekdone have free tiers, and Small Improvements offers a 30-day trial.
Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Writes, edits and checks every page on this site.
Written, edited and fact-checked by Sebastiaan Smits. Last reviewed 9 October 2026. How we review.
