CRIO alternatives: 11 clinical trial management tools compared

Research sites look for a CRIO alternative when the CTMS they run is tied to an eSource system they did not choose, when they want a quote with a number in it, or when they need to oversee many sites as a sponsor or CRO rather than run one. They move to site-focused CTMS vendors, to European or hybrid-hosting suites, or to enterprise portfolio systems.

Short answer: Looking for a replacement for CRIO? RealTime CTMS, SimpleTrials and BSI CTMS come first in our clinical trial management software ranking. Where a category has smaller vendors worth recommending, they occupy the first three places and the big brands come below them. Start with RealTime CTMS if you want another site-first CTMS with billing and a modular add-on path. Each of the 11 alternatives sits in Best Clinical Trial Management Software in 2026 and is described against CRIO.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.

CRIO

#4 of 12 in our clinical trial management software ranking

  • Pricing: Pricing on request; demo booking only
  • Established in: United States
  • Built for: Independent sites and site networks that also want electronic source in the same vendor
  • Not for: Sponsors that need a sponsor-side portfolio CTMS across many CRO partners
01

Why buyers look past CRIO

  1. 01

    The CTMS is built to pair with one eSource

    CRIO says its site CTMS was built to work in tandem with its own eSource, so a scheduled patient flows into source capture and eSource procedures flow back for invoicing. That is convenient inside the pair. A site that already uses another capture tool, or that wants to replace one half later, has to price the whole arrangement.

  2. 02

    Pricing starts at a demo

    Its pages offer a demo and a contact number, and the pricing path we tried returned a missing page. A site comparing budgets cannot see a plan list, a per-site fee or a payment-processing add-on before a sales call. Vendors below that publish plan prices make that first comparison simpler.

  3. 03

    A site tool is not a portfolio tool

    CRIO describes a site CTMS as designed around recruitment, scheduling, finances and records rather than oversight of many studies. A sponsor, CRO or academic centre that needs monitoring reports, deviation logs and cross-study milestones usually looks at systems designed for that layer.

02

11 alternatives at a glance

Challengers first, then established names
AlternativeHeadquartersFree optionPricing model Switch ifOur rank
RealTime CTMSUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestyou want another site-first CTMS with billing and a modular add-on path#3
SimpleTrialsUnited StatesNo free tierPublishedyou need to see a monthly price before booking any call#1
BSI CTMSSwitzerlandNo free tierOn requestyou want a Swiss vendor with eTMF and supply management in the same licence#2
Ennov CTMSFranceNo free tierOn requestyou want a French vendor and the option of running the system on your own premises#5
Clinion CTMSUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestdeviation handling and layered monitoring-report review are your main gaps#8
Octalsoft CTMSNot stated by the vendorNo free tierOn requestone supplier for CTMS, EDC and randomisation is the goal#7
Cloudbyz CTMSUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestyour organisation already works in Salesforce and wants clinical operations there too#6
Advarra OnCoreUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestyou run a hospital research office with billing compliance duties#9
Medidata CTMSNot stated by the vendorNo free tierOn requestyour sponsor or CRO already captures data in Rave#10
Veeva Vault CTMSUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestyou are a sponsor already standardising on Veeva Vault#11
Oracle Life Sciences CTMSUnited StatesNo free tierOn requestyou want planning through trial operations from a single large supplier#12
03

What each one does differently

RealTime CTMS

United States · On request

RealTime Software Solutions, LLC of San Antonio, Texas builds around the research site as well, with site budgets, subject enrolment, visits, a calendar and automated invoicing. Its separate eSource, eReg and eISF modules suit a site that wants to adopt them one at a time. The pricing page names no amounts.

Switch from CRIO if you want another site-first CTMS with billing and a modular add-on path.

Our clinical trial management software guide puts RealTime CTMS at 3 of 12; read why →

SimpleTrials

United States · Published

Trial By Fire Solutions in Oakland lists every SimpleTrials plan on its pricing page, from a Sites plan up to Premium Plus, with an annual discount and a one-month paid trial. Contracts, payments and visit reports sit above the base plan. Data defaults to the US, and EEA hosting is a separate fee.

Switch from CRIO if you need to see a monthly price before booking any call.

More on SimpleTrials: ranked 1 of 12 in clinical trial management software →

BSI CTMS

Switzerland · On request

Swiss software house BSI Business Systems Integration AG, based in Baden, packs site monitoring, a feasibility portal, an eTMF and trial supply management into one application. The SaaS fee includes upgrades to new standard versions. EDC arrives through partners, so a site already attached to a data-capture tool keeps it.

Switch from CRIO if you want a Swiss vendor with eTMF and supply management in the same licence.

Open the BSI CTMS profile, 2nd of 12 in the clinical trial management software guide →

Ennov CTMS

France · On request

Ennov states that its website is run from its offices in Paris, and its CTMS sits on a Unified Compliance Platform shared with other life-sciences modules. Deployment can be cloud or on-premises, which matters to organisations that keep clinical systems inside their own network. It imports data from Ennov EDC.

Switch from CRIO if you want a French vendor and the option of running the system on your own premises.

Why Ennov CTMS is #5 among 12 clinical trial management software products →

Clinion CTMS

United States · On request

Clinion pairs a deviation log with major and minor levels, milestone tracking against plan and milestone invoicing. Monitoring reports can go through up to five review levels. Connection to Clinion EDC, RTSM and eTMF is native, and the vendor says third-party EDC systems can connect too. Ownership is split between Austin and an Indian parent.

Switch from CRIO if deviation handling and layered monitoring-report review are your main gaps.

Where Clinion CTMS stands: place 8 of 12 in the clinical trial management software ranking →

Octalsoft CTMS

Not stated by the vendor · On request

Octalsoft has served life-science companies since 2007 and lists offices in Herndon, Virginia and Ahmedabad, India. Its CTMS covers timelines, site profiles, enrolment, budgets and multi-currency reconciliation, inside a modular suite that also sells EDC, RTSM, eTMF and ePRO. Quotes are on request after a demo.

Switch from CRIO if one supplier for CTMS, EDC and randomisation is the goal.

See the full Octalsoft CTMS entry, ranked 7 of 12 among clinical trial management software products →

Cloudbyz CTMS

United States · On request

Cloudbyz, Inc. of Warrenville, Illinois runs its CTMS on the Salesforce platform, with open REST APIs, investigator and patient portals, RTSM, eTMF and eReg in one data model. It claims ISO 9001 and ISO 27001. Because Salesforce sits underneath, price the platform dependency along with the module count.

Switch from CRIO if your organisation already works in Salesforce and wants clinical operations there too.

Cloudbyz CTMS comes 6 of 12 when clinical trial management software products are ranked here →

Advarra OnCore

United States · On request

Advarra, Inc. licenses OnCore to academic medical centres and cancer centres running roughly fifty to more than five hundred active trials. The licence covers research management, billing compliance and Epic and Cerner exchange, while biospecimen management is a separate module. Fees follow module choice and protocol volume.

Switch from CRIO if you run a hospital research office with billing compliance duties.

Check Advarra OnCore in the ranked list (9 out of 12, clinical trial management software) →

Medidata CTMS

Not stated by the vendor · On request

Medidata calls itself a Dassault Systemes brand and dates the acquisition to June 2019. Its CTMS offers a monitoring workspace, study start-up tracking and visual analytics across studies. Rave EDC data fills the dashboards automatically and visit report data files into its eTMF, so the return is largest for teams already on Rave.

Switch from CRIO if your sponsor or CRO already captures data in Rave.

More on Medidata CTMS: ranked 10 of 12 in clinical trial management software →

Veeva Vault CTMS

United States · On request

Veeva Systems Inc., headquartered in Pleasanton, California, describes Veeva CTMS as an enterprise system for insourced and outsourced trials. Monitoring visit reports file trip reports into its eTMF on their own, and Clinical Transfer moves daily data between CROs and sponsors. The fullest automation assumes other Veeva applications.

Switch from CRIO if you are a sponsor already standardising on Veeva Vault.

Check Veeva Vault CTMS in the ranked list (11 out of 12, clinical trial management software) →

Oracle Life Sciences CTMS

United States · On request

Oracle Corporation groups its CTMS with portfolio planning, site selection, feasibility, site activation, patient recruitment and eTMF on one clinical operations page, delivered on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. The breadth means a quote can cover many modules, so ask which are required for your studies before comparing.

Switch from CRIO if you want planning through trial operations from a single large supplier.

Oracle Life Sciences CTMS comes 12 of 12 when clinical trial management software products are ranked here →

—

Which alternative for which situation

  1. 01

    You want plan prices you can read before a call

    SimpleTrials: Every plan from Sites up to Premium Plus is listed with monthly prices, plus a one-month paid trial; EEA hosting costs extra.

  2. 02

    You run a research site and want a similar site-first tool

    RealTime CTMS: It covers site budgets, visits, enrolment and automated invoicing, with eSource, eReg and eISF modules available separately.

  3. 03

    You want a Swiss vendor with eTMF in the same licence

    BSI CTMS: The CTMS bundles monitoring, a feasibility portal, eTMF and trial supply management, and the SaaS fee covers version upgrades.

  4. 04

    You need cloud or on-premises deployment

    Ennov CTMS: It is run from Paris and can be deployed in the cloud or on your own premises, with imports from Ennov EDC.

  5. 05

    You are a hospital research office with billing duties

    Advarra OnCore: OnCore is licensed to academic and cancer centres with Epic and Cerner exchange, priced by modules and protocol volume.

04

When CRIO is still the right choice

CRIO stays the right choice for a research site that wants scheduling, recruitment, finances and source capture in one system. Its CTMS handles multi-currency receivables and payables, invoices and payment vouchers, and cash-card stipends with year-end 1099 reporting. Procedures captured in eSource flow into invoicing without rekeying. Sign-in is offered for the United States, Canada, Australia and the European Union, with servers in Germany among them. If your pain is one missing feature, ask about it before leaving.

05

What moving off CRIO involves

  1. 01

    Visit and budget templates need rebuilding

    Receivables, payables and stipend amounts are set per visit or procedure in CRIO. Export every active study budget and compare line by line, because a new system may group procedures differently. Reconcile open invoices and sponsor reimbursements before the cutover date.

  2. 02

    Source data and CTMS may leave at different times

    If you also use CRIO eSource, the CTMS and source records share one platform. Decide whether to move both or only the operations side, and keep read access to closed-study source records for the retention period your sponsors and regulators require.

  3. 03

    Patient database and consent records

    Recruitment databases, call logs and screening questionnaires hold personal data. Ask the new vendor which fields import, where the data will be hosted, and how the old records are deleted afterwards, then document it under your data protection procedures.

06

Questions about replacing CRIO

6 answers
Does CRIO publish its prices?

Not on the pages we read. The site offers a demo request and a phone number, and the pricing address we tried returned a missing page. SimpleTrials lists monthly plan prices; most other vendors on this page quote after a demo.

Where does CRIO host European data?

Its security statement says clients can host in their own region and lists servers in the United States, Canada, Germany and Australia. The site also has a separate sign-in for the European Union.

Which alternatives are aimed at research sites rather than sponsors?

RealTime CTMS and SimpleTrials are built around site operations such as budgets, visits and invoicing. Advarra OnCore targets academic and cancer centres. Medidata, Veeva and Oracle lean towards sponsor and CRO oversight.

Is there a European alternative to CRIO?

BSI CTMS comes from Baden in Switzerland and Ennov CTMS from Paris. Ennov can run in the cloud or on-premises. Neither lists a price on the pages we read, so request a quote before assuming it is cheaper.

Can I keep my eSource system if I change CTMS?

Several vendors connect to outside systems. BSI uses partners for EDC, Clinion says third-party EDC can connect, and Cloudbyz lists open REST APIs. Ask each vendor for the exact integration you need, since data-capture tools differ from EDC.

Does CRIO handle patient payments?

Yes. Its CTMS page describes cash-card stipends through Dash Solutions, configurable amounts and prepayments, and automatic 1099 year-end reporting. If you leave, check how stipend balances on issued cards are settled.

—

Sources

Checked 10 November 2026
  • CRIO home page: Sign-in for United States, Canada, Australia and European Union; Boston address; eSource, eConsent, eRegulatory and Site CTMS products; demo booking.
  • CRIO Site CTMS: Recruitment tools, multi-currency receivables and payables, invoices, Dash Solutions stipend cards, 1099 reporting, built to work with CRIO eSource, site CTMS definition.
  • CRIO Security and Compliance: Regional hosting with servers in the United States, Canada, Germany and Australia; GDPR, Annex 11 and 21 CFR Part 11 statements.
  • SimpleTrials: Plan list from Sites to Premium Plus, Enterprise quoted, one-month paid trial, US default data location.
  • BSI Life Sciences: Baden, Switzerland; CTMS with eTMF, feasibility portal and supply management; SaaS fee includes upgrades.
  • RealTime Software Solutions: San Antonio, Texas; site budgets, enrolment, visits, invoicing; eSource, eReg and eISF modules.
  • Ennov: Paris offices; Ennov CTMS and IMPACT CTMS; cloud or on-premises; Ennov EDC import.
  • Clinion: Deviation log, milestone tracking, five review levels, native EDC, RTSM and eTMF links, Austin address.
  • Octalsoft: Operating since 2007; Herndon and Ahmedabad offices; CTMS inside modular eClinical suite.
  • Cloudbyz: Warrenville, Illinois; Salesforce platform; open REST APIs; ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 claims.
  • Advarra: OnCore for academic and cancer centres; module and protocol-volume licensing; Epic and Cerner exchange.
  • Medidata: Dassault Systemes brand, June 2019 acquisition; Rave EDC feeds; eTMF filing.
  • Veeva Systems: Pleasanton headquarters; Veeva CTMS eTMF filing and Clinical Transfer.
  • Oracle Life Sciences clinical trial operations: CTMS with planning, feasibility, activation, recruitment and eTMF on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure.
—

Who wrote this

Last reviewed 10 November 2026

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder · Amsterdam, Netherlands

Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page on this site; research and drafting are AI-assisted.

Checked and edited by Sebastiaan Smits, last on 10 November 2026. The editorial process explains the method.

—

Alternatives to other products