Microsoft SharePoint alternatives: 12 document management tools compared
Organisations look past SharePoint when the toolkit never became a system: libraries have grown into folders nobody understands, or an auditor has asked for retention that the current licence does not cover. They move to a finished document management product, either a small one bought at a published price or an archiving suite implemented by a partner.
Short answer: Smaller vendors fill the top three places where the category offers them, and the household names start at place 4. For Microsoft SharePoint users, the top three picks from our document management ranking are Speakap, Folderit and Revver. Pick Speakap if the SharePoint site you want to replace is the staff intranet and your frontline cannot reach it. These 12 products are all in Best Document Management Software in 2026; the notes say how each one compares with Microsoft SharePoint.
Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.
Pricing: Per user per month, published; included in most Microsoft 365 plans
Established in: United States
Built for: Microsoft 365 organisations with someone willing to design the structure
Not for: Firms without an administrator or with strict EU jurisdiction needs
01
Why buyers look past Microsoft SharePoint
01
A toolkit that waits for a designer
SharePoint does nothing until someone designs sites, libraries, content types and permissions. Companies without that person end up with a shared drive with extra steps. Those buyers want a product that arrives with its structure, approvals and retention already in a usable shape, such as Folderit, where workflows and automated retention policies are part of a listed plan.
02
Records features on a higher licence
Microsoft's licensing guidance grants retention policies and basic retention labels with Business Premium, E3 and above. Declaring items as records, disposition reviews and event-based retention need E5 or a Purview add-on. The moment compliance becomes serious, at the level of M-Files or Laserfiche, is the moment 'already paid for' stops being accurate.
03
Jurisdiction follows the vendor
Microsoft is an American company, and American jurisdiction applies whatever data region is selected. For firms with strict jurisdiction requirements, or with statutory archiving duties that a national auditor has to recognise, that can rule SharePoint out regardless of how well the features fit.
you have developers who want an open, extensible content platform with records governance included
#10
03
What each one does differently
1
Speakap
Netherlands · On request
Not a document system: Speakap is a frontline employee platform that replaces the intranet role of SharePoint for staff without a desk. Feed, acknowledged news and chat sit in its entry tier, HR sync and translation at Premium, and tasks plus the open API at Premium Plus. Hosting is in the EU or the US.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if the SharePoint site you want to replace is the staff intranet and your frontline cannot reach it.
Folderit is the finished small system that SharePoint is not. Mini is listed at EUR 45 a month for 5 users and 150 GB with OCR search, versioning and audit trails; Medium, at EUR 85 for 10 users and 500 GB, adds approval workflows, automated retention and custom metadata. API access and single sign-on sit on the Tailor plan.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you are a small organisation with nobody to design and administer SharePoint.
Revver supplies what SharePoint leaves to you: folder templates that impose structure, retention rules, simple workflow and a client portal. It is bought at published per-user tiers, from USD 25 per user per month on Basic to USD 87 on Full, with no account minimum; implementation is charged separately.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if a small service firm wants structure out of the box and a client portal.
OpenKM runs on your own server with metadata, workflow and records management in a free community edition, the reverse of SharePoint's vendor-hosted bundle. Recent community releases ship without published source, and the paid editions have no published price.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if documents must sit on your own infrastructure and a technical team can run it.
M-Files removes the folder tree that SharePoint libraries tend to drift back into: a document is described by its properties and appears wherever they apply. It works inside Microsoft 365 apps and runs in the cloud or self-hosted. The Essentials plan is listed at EUR 65 per seat monthly; Enterprise is quoted.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if retrieval is the real problem and you will invest in designing the metadata.
DocuWare leads with audit-proof archiving and invoice capture, keeping records unalterable for statutory periods in a form an auditor recognises, where SharePoint leads with co-authoring. It is sold through partners, and implementation is scoped and billed separately from the licence.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if incoming invoices and statutory archiving are the requirement, not collaboration.
Laserfiche combines retention schedules and disposition with a forms-driven workflow engine, records depth that SharePoint reaches only on higher licences. Everything arrives through a partner, and the system assumes a records manager that small organisations do not employ.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you are a public body or regulated organisation with a formal records function.
Fabasoft Cloud, from a listed Austrian company, keeps documents only in audited data centres in Austria, Germany or Switzerland, with BSI C5 and SOC 2 attestations. That answers the jurisdiction point SharePoint cannot. Workspaces suit cross-company sharing, and pricing is quoted.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if data residency and attestations are conditions of doing business with your clients.
NetDocuments organises everything by client and matter, with ethical walls and security profiles designed for professional firms, a model SharePoint would need someone to build. It is cloud only and priced per user after a sales conversation.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you run a law or advisory firm that files by matter.
Therefore is an Austrian-based product sold as Therefore Online, a single subscription edition on Microsoft Azure that can be taken monthly or yearly from one user, or as On-Premises and Subscription editions on your own hardware. Workflow, capture, eForms and archiving ship as modules of one product, where SharePoint assembles comparable parts from separate services. Prices are not published.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you want a finished workflow and archive product with the option to host it yourself.
d.velop, from Gescher in Germany, does not replace SharePoint so much as sit on it: its ECM for SharePoint extends libraries with invoice workflows, contract management and personnel files, surfaced in Teams and Outlook. It can also run as a standalone platform. Delivery runs through a network of more than 400 partners, and no prices are published.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you keep Microsoft 365 for collaboration but need invoice, contract or HR file processes on top.
Alfresco is an open source content, process and governance suite, now owned by Hyland, so the vendor is American like Microsoft. Process management and records governance are built into one platform, and it is open to integration through standard APIs. Collaboration extends Microsoft 365 and Google Docs rather than competing with them. A free trial is offered.
Switch from Microsoft SharePoint if you have developers who want an open, extensible content platform with records governance included.
When Microsoft SharePoint is still the right choice
SharePoint remains the sensible choice for a Microsoft 365 organisation with someone willing to design the structure. It is included in most plans, Office co-authoring works, and versioning, metadata columns and retention labels cover ordinary needs on Business Premium or E3. Every product listed here adds a second bill and a migration. If the design work gets done, many companies never need one.
05
What moving off Microsoft SharePoint involves
01
The metadata has to come with the files
An export that yields a folder tree of files leaves the columns behind. Before committing, move a hundred real documents and confirm that properties, version history and audit records arrive in a form the new system can map, not as something requested separately.
02
Protect the co-authoring habit
Staff edit Office files together inside SharePoint every day. The archiving-led systems lead with records, not collaboration. Consider leaving working documents in Microsoft 365 and moving only finished records, which avoids asking people to give up the feature they use most.
03
Retention labels must be restated
Purview labels belong to Microsoft's estate, and labels that mark items as records block editing and deletion. Write out each retention period with the rule behind it, rebuild them in the target, and check that scheduled deletion is automatic and logged. Do this before migrating, because retention shapes how the new system stores documents.
06
Questions about replacing Microsoft SharePoint
6 answers
Is SharePoint a real document management system?
It has the parts: versioning, metadata columns, Office co-authoring and Purview retention. It is a toolkit, not a finished system. Without designed sites, content types and permissions it behaves like a shared drive, which is why buyers compare Folderit, M-Files and DocuWare.
What is the best SharePoint alternative for a small business?
Folderit is priced per organisation: EUR 45 a month for 5 users, or EUR 85 for 10 users with approval workflows and automated retention.
Revver is the other direct-purchase option, from USD 25 per user per month, with client portals. Both are lighter than the partner-sold archiving suites.
Which SharePoint alternatives come from vendors outside the United States?
Several: Fabasoft Cloud and Therefore in Austria, DocuWare, d.velop and ELO Digital Office in Germany, M-Files in Finland, Folderit in Estonia and OpenKM in Spain. OpenKM can also be self-hosted, which keeps the documents on servers you run yourself.
Is M-Files better than SharePoint?
M-Files takes metadata furthest by removing folders altogether, so a document appears wherever its properties are relevant, and it works inside Microsoft 365 apps.
It only pays off with a carefully designed model. Essentials is listed at EUR 65 per seat monthly, while the Enterprise plan for regulated environments is quoted.
Do you need Microsoft 365 E5 for records management in SharePoint?
For the full version, yes. Microsoft's licensing guidance covers retention policies and ordinary retention labels with Business Premium or E3. Marking items as records, disposition reviews, event-based retention and adaptive scopes need E5 or a Purview add-on licence for the users who benefit.
Which SharePoint alternative reaches frontline staff on their own phones?
Speakap is the one on this page aimed at that job, as an employee platform rather than a document store.
It offers feed, acknowledged news and chat, and states go-live in as little as 15 days. Keep working documents in SharePoint and test Speakap for news.
Therefore home page: based in Austria; workflow, capture, eForms, archiving capabilities.
d.velop ECM for SharePoint: extension of SharePoint with invoice, contract and personnel file processes, Teams and Outlook integration.
d.velop home page: Gescher, Germany; 400+ partners; standalone platform.
Alfresco home page (Hyland): open source content, process and governance suite, Hyland ownership, Microsoft 365 and Google Docs collaboration, open APIs, free trial.
Speakap pricing: demo then offer, go-live in as little as 15 days, 52,000 sessions in nine months for a construction customer.
Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page on this site; research and drafting are AI-assisted.
Written, edited and fact-checked by Sebastiaan Smits. Last reviewed 9 November 2026. How we review.
