BambooHR made small-company HR software pleasant, and it remains an American product. People who look for a replacement are mostly employers outside the United States who find the compliance and payroll do not apply to them, or US companies that want payroll at the centre. They move to a regional HR system or a payroll-led platform.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this site; it never changes what we say about a product. How that works.
BambooHR's payroll is genuinely useful in the United States and largely irrelevant elsewhere. An employer in Europe keeps a separate local payroll provider, and the benefits handling and compliance features, written for US employment law, become decoration that it still pays for every month.
Pricing is per employee per month but quoted, so you learn the figure from sales. Factorial, Kenjo, Humaans, Breathe, Employment Hero, Keka, Zoho People and Sage HR all publish theirs, which lets a small company compare and start without a conversation it may not want.
In BambooHR the HR record leads and payroll is attached. American employers of fifty to a few thousand people who want tax filing, benefits and time run from the same place may prefer a product where payroll is the point, which is how our data describes Paylocity.
| Alternative | Country | Pricing | Our rank | Switch if |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HiBob | United Kingdom | Per employee per month, quoted | #3 | you are a scale-up that wants engagement features alongside the record |
| Paylocity | United States | Per employee per month, quoted | #14 | you are a US employer that wants payroll to be the core of the system |
| Personio | Germany | Per employee per month, quoted | #1 | you are a European company of fifty to five hundred people |
| Humaans | United Kingdom | Per employee per month, published | #7 | you have someone in-house who will integrate HR with the rest of your tools |
| Factorial | Spain | Per employee per month, published | #2 | you want a published price and several HR functions in one subscription |
| Kenjo | Germany | Per employee per month, published | #4 | you are a European company with shift-based or deskless staff |
| Breathe | United Kingdom | Per month per business in headcount bands, published; free trial | #8 | you are a UK small business without an HR team |
| Employment Hero | Australia | Per employee per month, published; payroll priced separately | #12 | you are a small employer in Australia, New Zealand or the UK |
United Kingdom · Per employee per month, quoted
Holds the employee record and leaves payroll to another provider, as BambooHR does outside the US, but adds a social layer of surveys, clubs and shout-outs. It has the nicest interface in the category, is expensive per seat, and its reporting needs configuring, where BambooHR's is a strength.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a scale-up that wants engagement features alongside the record.
United States · Per employee per month, quoted
A US payroll bureau and HR suite in one, so tax filing, benefits and time do not need a separate provider. Compared with BambooHR the payroll is the centre of the product. Pricing is quoted and rises with modules, and contracts run for years.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a US employer that wants payroll to be the core of the system.
Germany · Per employee per month, quoted
Written for European employment law instead of adapted to it, with recruiting included and payroll run or connected in specific markets. That reverses BambooHR's American assumptions. It is quoted, has a minimum that hurts small teams, and implementation is a project, which BambooHR avoids.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a European company of fifty to five hundred people.
United Kingdom · Per employee per month, published
A fast employee record with a complete API and a published price, aimed at teams that assemble their own stack. It deliberately omits performance, learning and recruiting, and trades BambooHR's large ready-made integration catalogue for an interface people build on themselves.
Switch from BambooHR if you have someone in-house who will integrate HR with the rest of your tools.
Spain · Per employee per month, published
Bundles HR, time tracking, expenses and shift planning in one subscription with the per-employee price published and a free trial, where BambooHR asks for a quote. Each module is competent, not deep, and payroll depth and support quality vary by market.
Switch from BambooHR if you want a published price and several HR functions in one subscription.
Germany · Per employee per month, published
A modern system for mid-size European companies that find Personio expensive and BambooHR foreign. Shift planning and attendance are first-class and the price is published. Its integration list is much smaller than BambooHR's and it is less proven at scale.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a European company with shift-based or deskless staff.
United Kingdom · Per month per business in headcount bands, published; free trial
Charges a flat published fee per business by headcount band, not per employee, and is built around UK employment practice for firms up to 250 staff. Like BambooHR outside the US it has no payroll of its own, and its reporting and permissions are shallow.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a UK small business without an HR team.
Australia · Per employee per month, published; payroll priced separately
Adds employment contracts, payroll and a benefits marketplace to the HR record at a published per-employee price, with payroll charged separately. Its compliance content is written for Australia and the UK first, the same kind of home-market bias BambooHR has for the US.
Switch from BambooHR if you are a small employer in Australia, New Zealand or the UK.
BambooHR is still a sound choice for a US company that wants HR running without an implementation project. Onboarding, e-signature and reporting are among the easiest to use, the integration catalogue is large, the product is mature and predictable, and its payroll is useful where it was designed to be. An American employer happy with that has little reason to move.
A US customer running payroll inside BambooHR is replacing two things. If the new HR system has no payroll, a provider must be chosen and the first run checked in parallel; if it has payroll at its core, the HR record follows that decision.
BambooHR's integration catalogue is one of its main assets, so list every connected tool before leaving. Smaller vendors such as Kenjo have fewer integrations, and Humaans expects you to build on its API, which needs someone in-house to do the work.
E-signed documents and leavers' records sit in the system and carry retention obligations. Decide what moves, what is archived and what is deleted, then load your real employee export into the candidate system instead of trusting the vendor's demo data.
It works as an employee record, but its compliance, benefits handling and payroll assume US employment law, so a European employer keeps a separate local payroll provider. Personio, Factorial and Kenjo are built for European companies, and Breathe for UK small businesses.
Factorial, Kenjo, Humaans, Keka, Employment Hero, Zoho People and Sage HR publish a per-employee rate, and Breathe publishes a flat fee by headcount band. BambooHR, Personio, HiBob and Paylocity quote. A published rate still needs checking for minimum headcount and separately priced modules.
HiBob is aimed at scale-ups that treat engagement as an HR outcome and has the interface employees open most willingly, at a high per-seat cost.
BambooHR is the more predictable record, with reporting that works without configuration and US payroll. Neither is a payroll answer for a multi-country employer.
Our data does not rank exact prices, but Zoho People is described as low-cost with a published per-employee rate, and Breathe's flat fee per business keeps the bill low for a small UK firm.
Both are lighter products: Zoho People's interface is dated and Breathe has no real multi-country support.
