Optimizely alternatives are mostly sought by teams smaller than the one it is built for: a marketer or a small CRO group facing an individually packaged contract and a platform that assumes a dedicated experimentation function. They move to tools with published pricing and a visual editor, or to a specialist in the one thing they need.
Short answer: Looking for a replacement for Optimizely? Kameleoon, Mutiny and VWO (now part of Wingify) come first in our website personalization & CRO ranking. Smaller vendors fill the top three places where the category offers them, and the household names start at place 4. Start with Kameleoon if EU data hosting or a published starting price is a stated requirement. Below are 11 alternatives, each taken from the Best Website Personalization & CRO Software in 2026 ranking, with its main difference from Optimizely.
Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. How that works.
Optimizely combines server-side and client-side experimentation, content personalisation and feature flags in one control plane. That depth is aimed at organisations with a dedicated experimentation function. A marketer running one campaign at a time finds the setup heavier than the job in front of them requires.
02
No price until you talk to sales
Optimizely states that every plan is individually packaged, and the route to a number is a demo request. That is normal for enterprise software and a real obstacle for a buyer who needs to compare costs quickly. Convert lists plans from USD 299 a month, Kameleoon a starter plan from USD 495, and OptiMonk a free tier.
03
A platform when you wanted a tool
Optimizely grew from pure A/B testing into a full digital experience platform. Buyers who only want product recommendations for a shop, account-based personalisation for a B2B site, or pop-ups and offers often find that a narrower product reaches that single outcome with less to set up.
you want site personalisation and outbound messaging run from one customer-data platform
#11
03
What each one does differently
1
Kameleoon
France · Published
Offers web and feature experimentation plus personalisation, with data hosted in the EU or the US. Unlike Optimizely it publishes an entry point: a starter plan from USD 495 a month for up to 10 experiments and 50,000 monthly visitors, with feature management and personalisation as add-ons. Enterprise is quoted.
Switch from Optimizely if EU data hosting or a published starting price is a stated requirement.
A no-code tool that changes headlines, proof points and calls to action using firmographic and intent data for account-based marketing. Unlike Optimizely it is not a general testing platform, and B2C or content sites gain little. Pricing is sales-led.
Switch from Optimizely if you run ABM and want personalisation without an engineer touching the page.
VWO merged with AB Tasty and is now sold as Wingify. The platform covers A/B, split URL and multivariate testing, personalisation, feature management and behaviour analytics with heatmaps and recordings. Its pricing page shows Growth, Pro and Enterprise tiers without prices, so it is quoted like Optimizely, with a 30-day free trial.
Switch from Optimizely if a mid-market team wants research and testing in one subscription and can start on a free trial.
AB Tasty has merged with VWO under the Wingify name, and its pricing page now leads to Wingify's. The combined suite covers much the same ground as Optimizely: experimentation, personalisation, feature management and commerce search and recommendations. Pricing is quoted here too, so it is no shortcut on procurement.
Switch from Optimizely if you want the same mix of testing and feature flags from another vendor.
Publishes its plans by monthly tested users: Growth is USD 299 a month on annual billing for 100,000 tested users with A/B and split URL testing; Pro, at USD 420, adds multivariate and full-stack testing. It is an experimentation tool first, not the broad experience platform Optimizely has become.
Switch from Optimizely if privacy posture and a published price outweigh platform breadth.
The testing and personalisation engine inside Adobe Experience Cloud, where audiences and content sync with Adobe Analytics and Experience Manager without middleware. Bought standalone it is expensive and heavy to implement, and as with Optimizely no price is published.
Switch from Optimizely if the organisation already runs Adobe Analytics and Experience Manager.
Centres on algorithmic product recommendations and audience-level personalisation for large retailers, where Optimizely's roots are in experimentation. It is enterprise-only and quoted, assumes a data layer is already in place, and depends on high event volume.
Switch from Optimizely if you are a large retailer and recommendations matter more than running tests.
The accessible end of the market: a no-code builder for pop-ups, nudges and personalised offers aimed at ecommerce. The free plan covers 10,000 pageviews a month on one domain, and paid plans start at USD 19 a month. It offers variant and multi-campaign A/B tests, not a general experimentation platform.
Switch from Optimizely if you run a shop and want cart-abandonment and offer campaigns without an experimentation team.
A landing-page builder with testing attached, not an experimentation platform. Plans are published: Starter at USD 29 a month (USD 22 billed yearly), then Build, Experiment and Optimize, with traffic caps from 500 to 50,000 visitors and A/B testing from the Experiment plan. It tests the pages it hosts, so site-wide, server-side or feature-flag work is out of scope.
Switch from Optimizely if you test paid-traffic landing pages and want a listed price and a 14-day trial.
A customer-data and marketing-automation platform in which web personalisation and A/B testing are two channels beside email, SMS, WhatsApp and app messaging. Pricing is a platform fee plus usage, and the vendor says most brands start at USD 60,000 or more a year and about 500,000 monthly visitors. It does not cover server-side feature flags.
Switch from Optimizely if you want personalisation driven by one customer profile across email, SMS and the website.
An omnichannel engagement suite that joins a customer data platform, web personalisation, journey orchestration and channels such as email, web push, WhatsApp and SMS. The website pushes a demo request rather than a price list, so it is quoted like Optimizely. Its centre is messaging to known customers, with testing as one capability among many.
Switch from Optimizely if you want site personalisation and outbound messaging run from one customer-data platform.
Optimizely is the right platform for an organisation with a dedicated experimentation function that tests both in the browser and on the server, ships features behind flags, and wants content personalisation managed from the same control plane. When product and marketing teams would otherwise buy separate tools for those jobs, consolidating them is the argument, and the lighter alternatives do not cover all of it.
05
What moving off Optimizely involves
01
Find the experiments that live in code
Client-side tests can be recreated in another visual editor. Server-side experiments and feature flags are written into the application, so replacing Optimizely there means engineering work in the codebase. Inventory those first, because they set the timeline for the whole migration.
02
Let running tests finish
A test moved mid-flight cannot be read, since results gathered in two tools cannot be combined. Conclude or stop what is running in Optimizely, record the outcomes, and start new experiments in the replacement. Keep that archive: it stops a team repeating old tests.
03
Check one tool still covers both teams
Optimizely serves marketing and product from one platform. OptiMonk works on the marketing side only, so product would need its own flagging arrangement. Wingify, the merged VWO and AB Tasty, lists feature management; Convert includes full-stack testing from its Pro plan; and Kameleoon sells feature management as an add-on, which keeps more in scope.
06
Questions about replacing Optimizely
5 answers
What is the best Optimizely alternative for a mid-market team?
Convert and Kameleoon are the two with a listed entry price: Convert from USD 299 a month on annual billing for 100,000 tested users, Kameleoon from USD 495 a month for 50,000 visitors.
Wingify, the merged VWO and AB Tasty, adds heatmaps and recordings but is quoted.
Is there an Optimizely alternative with published pricing?
Yes. Convert lists plans from USD 299 a month billed annually, Kameleoon a starter plan from USD 495 a month, and OptiMonk a free tier with paid plans from USD 19 a month by pageviews.
Wingify, which now combines VWO and AB Tasty, shows tiers without prices, like Optimizely.
Which Optimizely alternative also does feature flags?
Wingify, the merged VWO and AB Tasty platform, lists feature management with rollouts alongside web experimentation and personalisation. Kameleoon offers feature management and rollout as an add-on, and Convert includes full-stack testing from its Pro plan. OptiMonk is limited to on-site campaigns.
Is Optimizely too much for a small ecommerce site?
Probably. Its individually packaged plans assume more than a single-campaign marketer needs.
OptiMonk offers no-code pop-ups and personalised offers free up to 10,000 pageviews a month, then from USD 19 a month, and Nosto adds product recommendations to platforms such as Shopify and BigCommerce without heavy custom implementation.
Are VWO and AB Tasty still separate products?
They have merged into one company and platform called Wingify; both the VWO and AB Tasty pricing addresses now lead to Wingify's pricing page, which lists Growth, Pro and Enterprise tiers on request. Separate logins for existing AB Tasty and VWO customers remain.
Founder of The Knowledge Engineers and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page on this site; research and drafting are AI-assisted.
Sebastiaan Smits wrote and checked this page, most recently on 2 November 2026. See how we review.
